Employee Login

Enter your login information to access the intranet

Enter your credentials to access your email

Reset employee password

Article

Your Employees Are Disengaged. Listening Isn’t Enough. Follow-Through Is.

May 7, 2026
By Emily Barlean

Employee engagement is in freefall.

Globally, just 20% of employees are engaged right now. That’s down from 23% in 2022. The rest are either coasting or actively spreading discontent. And it’s costing the economy an estimated $10 trillion in lost productivity. That’s roughly 9% of global GDP.

Why? The reasons are layered. People are operating in a climate of ongoing uncertainty and anxiety. Organizations are asking them to absorb near-constant change while doing more with less. Priorities keep shifting. Expectations are high. Support feels thin.

In this environment, one thing becomes critical for employees: feeling heard. Employees want visibility and agency, especially when circumstances keep shifting.

Here’s where most organizations fall short: they have the listening infrastructure in place — surveys, focus groups, meetings — but they stop after intake. Organizations collect the feedback and then the trail goes cold. No explanation of what happens next. No visible follow-through. No proof that the input actually mattered.

Why Organizations Stop After They Collect Feedback

Most companies confuse listening with infrastructure. They build the intake mechanisms and believe that’s the work. But listening and acting are two separate systems, and most have only built one.

Here’s the typical sequence: data comes in, analysis happens, someone files a report and leadership reviews it. Then silence. Employees wait. They shared something. Where did it go? Is anyone actually doing anything? Will anyone tell them what happened?

The radio silence breaks trust faster than the listening ever builds it.

Organizations aren’t malicious. They’re just flawed. They’ve invested in collection and haven’t built the response system. And that’s the gap that’s costing them retention, engagement, and productivity.

What Best-in-Class Organizations Actually Do

Leading companies layer multiple channels — skip-level meetings, focus groups, roadshows, ask-me-anything sessions, pulse surveys. No single source of truth. Just a wide enough net so they catch every voice.

But the channels are only the starting line. The separation happens in what comes after.

Best-in-class organizations designate specific leaders with clear accountability for the feedback process and they communicate that ownership internally. Then — this is the part most organizations skip — those leaders communicate back.

They share what feedback they received. They explain what actions they’re taking in response. They articulate what they decided not to do and why. They use videos, infographics, town halls, and repeat the message until it actually lands.

The result? Employees feel heard. Even when the answer isn’t what they wanted. Because they see their input shaped the decision-making process.

The Gamechanger: Building an Employee Communications Council

The most effective organizations embed employees directly into the decision-making process, not as a token gesture, but as a real intelligence mechanism. One way to do this is to establish an employee communications council.

Representative of different areas of the business, this group can be enlisted to review communications before rollout and serves as an early-warning system: Is this landing? What are we missing? Where will this break down on the front lines?

But a council only works if the organization acts on its feedback. When the organization adjusts messages, channels and other approaches in accordance with the council’s input, internal communications effectiveness can improve – and so can important metrics, such as awareness, understanding, confidence and engagement.

The Bottom Line

Disengagement isn’t just a morale problem. Often, it’s a trust problem.

Employees stop believing their voice matters when organizations collect feedback and then operate in silence. Employers break trust when they keep employees guessing about decisions that affect them.

Building real listening systems requires courage from both sides. Employees have to trust that speaking up will make a difference. Leaders have to be willing to share what’s happening, even when the answer isn’t what people want to hear. They have to trust their workforce with transparency.

The companies pulling away from the pack right now aren’t just the ones with the best culture decks or compensation packages. They’re the ones treating employee feedback as business intelligence. They understand that in times of uncertainty, people don’t just need information. They need proof that their voice shapes decisions and that their leaders trust them enough to be honest about what’s happening next.

Ready to build a listening – and response – strategy that actually closes the loop?