Employee Login

Enter your login information to access the intranet

Enter your credentials to access your email

Reset employee password

Article

We Went to Cannes Lions: Where the Industry Is Trending

July 1, 2026
By Jim Joseph

Every year that I go to the Cannes Lions Festival of Creativity, I go to watch the trends in action. There are generally one or two themes that dominate, ones we can take back to our teams and our clients for continual learning. But Cannes Lions 2026 was different. The energy shifted. Not the glittery awards show energy because that’s always there in full force. But the thinking shifted. I was at the edge of my theater seat.

After spending a week going from panel to keynote to networking event to insights presentation, it’s clear the industry is waking up to what we need to do in the current marketplace. It’s a tough one to navigate, and it’s decidedly different than what we’ve been chasing the last few years.

FleishmanHillard’s Global Head of Brand Impact Jim Joseph (second from left) and Chief Inclusion and Impact Officer Adrianne C. Smith appear at Inkwell Beach’s License to Lead: Reclaiming the Art of Storytelling.

AI is finally getting relegated to the side.

For the past three years, every conversation started with AI. AI this, AI that, AI will replace us all. Run for the hills! At Cannes Lions this year, the AI conversation took a different shape. AI showed up as a tool, not the strategy. Humans stayed at the center.

Just take a look at the award-winning work that actually cut through. It wasn’t built by AI. It was built with the help of AI. That distinction is game-changing for how we move forward.

Engagement became participation.

The old model: brands create, audiences consume. Brands engage, audiences respond. Well, that’s over.

The campaigns winning now are moving beyond engagement and asking people to participate and to be a part of the work. To co-create. The audience isn’t a target anymore. They’re collaborators.

Participation breaks into culture in a way engagement never could.

Consumers stopped being transactions.

Here’s what felt most important: brands are finally seeing people again. People. Not demographics, not segments and not customer lifetime value or conversion rates. People.

Real people with real lives, real contradictions, and real humanity. Your work changes when you view your people through that lens. The empathy is different and the insight lands more effectively.

Sports and its adjacencies are the driver of culture.

Sports marketing dominated the conversations at Cannes. Sports (the culture, the tribalism, the meaning around it) is where brands are finding relevance.

Sports has become the heartbeat of culture. And if you’re not thinking about sports, you’re thinking small.

Creators replaced advertising.

Co-creation on creator channels has become the new, pragmatic media with brands showing up in creator spaces, collaborating and building content together instead of buying space for ads. This is a partnership now, far beyond what we used to do with “influencers.”

The divide between brand and creator is collapsing. And that’s the point.

B2B is still sleeping.

I was a little shocked to see that B2B creativity hasn’t caught up yet. I, for one, predicted 2026 would be the year B2B breaks into culture. It hasn’t. The opportunity is there but the creative thinking hasn’t arrived yet.

B2B is still operating in the old playbook. That’s an opportunity for anyone brave enough to actually think differently about it.

So what does this all mean?

We introduced research at Cannes Lions 2026 called “The Chaos Advantage.” The insight underneath it all is that the brands winning right now are the ones comfortable navigating through the chaos, polarization and uncertainty we are facing. They break through it and grow while their competitors sit back and play it safe.

These brands are embracing the unpredictability that comes with real participation, with tools that help them to navigate the risk that is inherently in the system. They work the risk to their advantage.

Jim Joseph reports from Cannes: “Safe is not the best way to go anymore. Brands need to be bold again.”

That’s the shift, and that’s what Cannes Lions was telling us.

Marketing is a spectator sport, so let’s all learn from this amazing Festival and elevate our work as a result.

I want to see you on the awards stage next year!

Jim Joseph width= Jim Joseph is FleishmanHillard’s global head of brand impact, responsible for leading global brand business across B2B, B2C and B2G audiences, leveraging communications to enable commerce and business outcomes for the agency’s clients. He is a member of FleishmanHIllard’s Global Executive Advisory.

 

 
Article

Healthcare’s Moment Has Arrived. The Question Now Is: Will Your Organization Move Fast Enough?

By Jacob Porpossian

Health and Pharma showed up differently this year at Cannes Lions 2026. What we witnessed solidified the trend we’ve been seeing over the last 18 months. The most effective work stopped treating science and culture as opposing forces. In fact, when bridged together, is when the work became the strongest.

From the Super Bowl to the Oscars, and now across the Cannes shortlist, the winning campaigns recognized that patients are more than just consumers of medical information. They’re participants in culture. In an industry all-too familiar with regulation, the increased political, social, and economic uncertainty of recent years has added even more barriers to getting bold creative work out into the world. Legal teams are more cautious. Approval processes have lengthened. But here’s what’s critical: the brands moving fastest aren’t waiting for permission to ease. They’re leveraging culture as a bridge between science and human behavior.

Relax Your Tight End didn’t win the Grand Prix because of a clever concept.

Novartis won because the brand identified a cultural barrier. It took hold of the shame and misconceptions around male health screening and addressed it through an institution men trusted: the NFL. The culmination of football heroes and personalities speaking openly about prostate cancer, a Super Bowl platform, real-world testing at games and the discovery through a cultural moment that already mattered created the perfect campaign to follow up last year’s focus on breast cancer with “Your Attention Please” and the ultimate multi-year strategy to solidify Novartis as a brand to remember and trust when thinking oncology.

That same human truth showed up across this year’s other finalists. For example, Beat Cancer Off wasn’t afraid to say what everyone was thinking. The campaign leaned into a human truth about male sexuality and early cancer prevention, encouraging men to embrace a natural behavior as part of preventative health. And once again, Viagra found a way to work within China’s regulatory constraints by embracing creative mischief.

For healthcare organizations moving forward, here’s what we can learn from our time at the Palais.

1. Reframe uncertainty as opportunity. Political and social turbulence requires strategic boldness, not retreat.

2. Lead with cultural insight. The winning work didn’t lead with efficacy data. It started with a human barrier and found a cultural entry point.

3. Build for tentpole moments. Combine broadcast with real-world activation, executive voice with earned conversation.

4. Partner across both worlds. You need creative ambition married to regulatory rigor.

The conversation has shifted from science or culture to science and culture. The question now is whether your organization is ready to move.

Jacob Popossian width= Jacob Porpossian is the Global Executive Creative Director for FleishmanHillard’s Health & Life Sciences practice, where he builds and leads creative and storytelling capabilities for major health brands. With a background spanning creative strategy, digital marketing, communications, and production, he advises integrated teams across healthcare, CPG, corporate, and technology sectors, while also championing diversity and inclusion initiatives across the agency and industry.

 
Article

The Visible CEO: How Leadership Can Serve as a Strategic Asset

By Michael Moroney

In the U.S., the CEO is no longer just the chief decision-maker. The CEO is increasingly the chief proof point.

That shift is being driven by a business environment defined by political volatility, regulatory uncertainty, technological acceleration, economic pressure and heightened stakeholder scrutiny. It is also a reality in a fractured information consumption environment where trust and clarity has to compete with fast-moving algorithms and communications regimes that depend on stakeholders following a signal through the noise.

FleishmanHillard’s U.S. License to Lead report describes this as a moment when companies are operating at the intersection of business, policy, politics and culture and where shifts in one area quickly create second- and third-order effects across the others. In this context, the central leadership challenge is not simply setting the right strategy; it is securing permission to execute when that strategy must evolve.

Previously, in stable environments, a company could often rely on institutional credibility, brand equity or strong performance to carry the weight of change. In the new normal, that is no longer enough. Stakeholders are not only judging what companies decide; they are judging who is explaining it, whether that explanation is credible and whether leadership appears to be acting from principle or pressure.

That is why CEO and executive positioning – when executed strategically – has become an asset. This does not mean visibility for its own sake. Not more posts, panels, interviews or staged accessibility. But disciplined, consistent and substantive visibility that helps stakeholders understand where the company is going, why decisions are being made and what principles will hold steady as circumstances change.

The U.S. data shows why this matters, and it is striking. Confidence in large companies is thin: only 10% of U.S. engaged consumers say they have “a lot” of confidence that leaders of large companies will act in the best interest of society; only 11% are very optimistic that leaders of large companies will successfully address major challenges over the next decade; and only 12% believe large organizations are very prepared to lead during disruption.

This is the credibility deficit into which CEOs are now communicating. It is also the reason their strategic visibility cannot be treated as a communications accessory. When baseline confidence is low, the absence of visible leadership becomes its own signal. Silence invites interpretation. Delegated explanations can feel evasive. And inconsistent messages from different leaders can quickly become evidence of drift.

The opportunity is that stakeholders are not asking CEOs to be flawless. They are asking them to be clear, accountable and real. Among U.S. engaged consumers, 83% say integrity and honesty are very important to earning confidence in a business leader, 82% say the same of accountability when things go wrong and 73% say competence and decision quality are very important. Yet only 16% of U.S. engaged consumers say major company leaders often demonstrate integrity and honesty and only 13% say they often demonstrate accountability when things go wrong.

That gap is the visibility mandate. The CEO’s job is not to “message” integrity; it is to make it observable. Stakeholders need to see leadership explain hard decisions, acknowledge trade-offs, take responsibility and connect action to enduring principles. Visibility becomes valuable when it gives people evidence that leadership is not hiding behind the institution.

The research also suggests that stakeholders increasingly want direct leadership communication. In the U.S., 88% of engaged consumers say it is important for individual company leaders, rather than the company itself, to speak directly to stakeholders.

That does not mean every issue requires the CEO to be out front. It does mean that, in moments that build or test credibility, stakeholders want to hear from accountable humans, not only from the corporate voice.

The stakes are commercial as well as reputational. Our research finds that 98% of U.S. engaged consumers think it is important for companies to explain why a decision is made, while 49% say inconsistent or conflicting messages from company leadership greatly decrease their confidence. When confidence breaks, behavior follows: 64% of U.S. engaged consumers say they have stopped buying from or significantly reduced spending with a company after losing confidence in it; 49% switched to a competitor; and 46% privately advised friends or family against the company.

That makes strategic CEO visibility a business risk-management tool. It can reduce the friction that slows strategy, protect confidence during disruption and help prevent a difficult decision from becoming a broader reputation problem. But it only works when it is connected to substance.

For CEOs, the implication is straightforward. Visibility and positioning should be treated as a leadership discipline, not a media tactic. It should be planned around the moments that matter most to the business: strategy shifts, workforce decisions, innovation bets, social and policy choices, operational challenges and proof points of progress. And it should be consistent across audiences, but not generic.

In this environment, the visible CEO is not the loudest CEO. The visible CEO is the one who shows up before trust is tested, explains decisions before others define them, and connects the company’s actions to a durable set of principles.

Reputation is no longer only something companies protect when things go wrong. It is the asset that determines whether they can move when change becomes necessary. And in the U.S., where confidence in large companies is fragile and stakeholders are watching closely, CEO visibility is one of the clearest ways to turn reputation from a passive measure of perception into an active driver of permission, resilience and growth.

Michael Moroney width= Michael Moroney is a senior partner and the managing director of Corporate Affairs, The Americas.

 
Article

How to Win the GLP-1 Food Industry Wake-Up Call

June 30, 2026
By Kristie Sigler, Allison Koch and Amanda Patterson

GLP-1 medications may actually impact the food and agriculture industries more than the healthcare industry. Why? While GLP-1 drug offerings remain standardized, each GLP-1 user has distinct and evolving food needs. And the impact of those food choice changes cascades far beyond one person, rippling through families and friend groups. GLP-1 use will have a multiplier effect on the food, beverage and agriculture industries for years to come. Understanding the diversity of GLP-1 users has moved from being of interest to being imperative.

Two years ago, we started having conversations internally. We were watching the GLP-1 landscape shift in real time, and one thing became crystal clear: companies were trying to solve for a consumer they didn’t actually know. So, we decided to build something different. We combined the lived experience of GLP-1 patients across their entire medication journey, from day one through discontinuation. We layered in their demographic details, their real struggles, and paired it all with the clinical expertise of registered dietitians who counsel and support these patients daily. The result? The GLP-1 Lens – a synthetic AI audience grounded in actual consumer truths and clinical reality, not assumptions. A tool to not just shape your actions today but to map opportunities with your future target markets.

Why does this matter? Because the consumer on day one of their GLP-1 journey looks nothing like the consumer on day 180. We can’t treat GLP-1 patients like one giant monolith. Think of each user as a dot of color in a kaleidoscope. Marketing to GLP-1 patients is like playing with that kaleidoscope. Every time you think you have a clear picture, that teeny turn changes the image. And these days there are as many turns (new drug forms, new food insights, new markets, new food launches) as there are colorful prisms in the GLP-1 kaleidoscope. Understanding these users guides your work and accelerates your advantages.

How?

You stop guessing. Reformulated products and tailored menu items may work for those just starting on their journey, but not for those on maintenance. But without this insight, you’d never know until negative reviews tank your launch. GLP-1 Lens can tell you when to start messaging your product to have your message match their need.

You can move faster. Instead of 18-month product development cycles or campaign messages built on assumptions, you iterate on validated insights. GLP-1 Lens could get you extra months in market.

You build loyalty. Influencer programs and products that meet consumers where they actually are—not where you assume they are—create brand advocates, not one-time buyers. GLP-1 Lens can help create brand fans.

The GLP-1 landscape is being written right now. And how it looks today will be vastly different tomorrow. Companies that rely on authentic insights will own this moment. Those that don’t will be left picking up the pieces.

Contact Kristie Sigler – [email protected] – for more.

Article

Cannes Lions Exposed an Industry’s Transition of Power: Takeaways From Winning Work

June 26, 2026
By Cameron Shields

Hot take: PR people have spent too much time defending their existence. Defending budgets. Defending earned media. Defending why communications should be involved before the crisis, not after it. Defending why reputation matters.

But this year, the winning work at Cannes Lions made one thing abundantly clear: PR has moved on. Or up, rather. The business criticality is unignorable. And it’s the new center of gravity.

No more earned media first. It’s earned impact first. And everyone wants a piece of it.

PR Is No Longer Downstream

PR used to be the last stop. A product launches. A campaign gets approved. A crisis happens. Then PR enters the picture.

“Inside the PR Lions Jury Room” revealed what happens when PR moves upstream and shapes the agenda instead of responding to it.

The winning campaigns of 2025-2026 asked:

  1. Could PR free a country from oppression?
  2. Could PR influence government policy?
  3. Could PR turn negative customer feedback into its strongest commercial driver?

The answer was a resounding yes.

Contagious editorial director Alex Jenkins presents FleishmanHillard research during his Cannes Lions keynote.

When communications can change behavior, influence policy, galvanize communities, ripple culture and create outcomes that matter in the real world, the only thing left to ask is: when will the briefs catch up and what needs to happen to ensure they stay that way?

Upholding the Mantle: Our New Responsibility

One juror put it plainly: “PR is not a nice-to-have. It’s a must-have.”

If securing a seat at the table is yesterday’s battle, the responsibility now is to make communications worthy of staying there.

FleishmanHillard’s Young Lions competitors Rebecca Weinstein (from left) and Jonathan Arias catch up with Jim Joseph, Global Head of Brand Impact.

Of the winning work this year, here’s what that looks like:

  1. Simplicity Is a Competitive Advantage. Simplify your programs; elevate the point of view. The Swedish Rx became one of the jury’s favorite examples: a Swedish prescription as a driver for tourism. The brilliance was in commitment rather than complexity. And while the execution expanded into multiple touchpoints, the idea remained pure. No twenty-slide explanation required. The jury repeatedly warned against a trap PR falls into all the time: “And then we did this. And then we did this. And then we did this.” Layer after layer until the idea disappears under the weight of its own presentation. Be integrated, but be clear.
  2. Bring Levity in a Heavy World. While “nostalgia” wasn’t on repeat this year, the draw of escapism was still strong, but evolved into something closer to whimsy. Humor even. Effervescence in a weighted world. Not self-aware brand snark. Actual fun. The Swedish Rx is a great example. Attention can once again be earned through delight just as much as through purpose.
  3. The Human CEO Is Finally Replacing the Corporate CEO. Don’t Revert. Gone are the days of the polished script. People are craving leadership and that’s coming through in the creative idea, not just the executive talk track. Campaigns from brands like Burger King and Columbia Sportswear reflected a growing appetite for executives who participate rather than perform. One standout example involved a CEO sharing a real phone number and actually listening. Accessibility became the story, transparency became the strategy, participation the platform. For years, communicators have focused on protecting executives. The next era is about connecting them. In a conversation with Fast Company and Inc.’s Stephanie Mehta, one of the top themes she observed was executives letting their guard down. Throw out the old script for good and lead through connection.
  4. Reputation Equals Brand, and Vice Versa. The distance between crisis and opportunity has evaporated. If there was one piece of work that captured where PR is heading, it was the KitKat Heist. A communications idea that won both PR and Crisis. Rather than lawyer a presented problem, it acknowledged reality, then flipped it into participation, challenging the age-old notion that crisis communications is only about containment. Reputation and brand together, in harmony, reduce friction and create opportunity. That’s what gives communicators the license to lead, not just operate.
  5. Business to the Center. While creative will always balance art, intuition and intelligence, evidence is still key. Prove the work is working for the business, or risk moving back to the sideline.

What PR Leaders Should Do Next

  • Stop measuring success by visibility. Start measuring movement, connectivity and effect.
  • Build ideas that people can participate in, not observe. Less flash in the pan, more longevity.
  • Trade safety for conviction.
  • Stop chasing culture. Understand its currents and contribute.
  • Bring your leaders closer to people.
  • Move faster. Intelligently. If uncertainty is the only thing we’re certain about, stop retreating. With reputation and brand at the center, you can turn a challenge into growth. That’s the Chaos Advantage.

PR leaders know the industry has already evolved. The only remaining question is whether the rest of us are still operating under the old definition.

Cameron Shields width= Cameron Shields is FleishmanHillard’s Global Head of Consumer, Brand Impact .

 

Article

Lessons From Cannes: Don’t Let Speed Fail Storytelling

June 25, 2026
By Annette Wells-Saur

My son used to love this Pixar/Disney character. Some of you may have heard of him: Lightning McQueen. In certain points of the movie(s), which I’ve watched a gazillion times, he could be heard giving his pre-race mantra: “Okay, here we go. Focus. Speed. I am speed…. I eat losers for breakfast… No, no, no, focus. Speed. Faster than fast, quicker than quick. I am Lightning.”

Yeah. It’s kind of long, but it has stuck with me for both parental and professional reasons. From a parental standpoint, it’s probably because I had to stay on my toes with a toddler who was always putting himself in harm’s way. Professionally, it feels relevant to those of us working in communications right now. You’re all racing. You all want speed.

But in a world where attention splinters and trust must be earned moment by moment, speed alone doesn’t work anymore.

If you’re responsible for brand storytelling, tune into sessions like “Unscripted: How Stories Earn Attention across Culture and Media,” at Cannes Lions 2026. This session by Malcolm Gladwell, a New York Times bestselling author, and Questlove, an Academy Award-winning filmmaker, drummer, DJ and member of The Roots, talked about what makes stories resonate, why certain ideas actually spread and how creators hold onto audiences as narratives shift and grow. The practical takeaway is that you can build cross-platform stories that begin with genuine connection. Position your brand so it shows up in culture with authenticity. Create a consistent narrative voice that audiences return to again and again.

But how do you do that while moving at Lightning McQueen speed?

Find some intentionality

Questlove says he spent years creating music without intention. He and his collaborators would jam, see what stuck and build from there. Then he studied other artists and realized their songs had purpose before they were written.

He shared that he never went through that process, but his next album will probably be the first created with specific purpose in mind.

This is where most brand storytellers get stuck. You have a content calendar. You have social platforms. You have internal channels. But before any of that, you need to know what you are trying to accomplish and why as you hop in the car and start racing. That’s the work before the work. Some organizations skip that part.

Your storytelling teams are testing what works across TikTok, LinkedIn, email, podcasts, earned media and internal channels. The format changes. The audience changes. The platform changes. But if the intention is clear and the voice is consistent, the story will travel. Without it, you’re just moving for the sake of moving.

Authentic isn’t optional

Also, stories don’t spread because they’re clever. They spread because audiences sense that someone actually knows what they’re talking about and actually cares, and it shows. So there’s a trust factor.

Questlove told a story about how he watched the Red Hot Chili Peppers huddle before 80,000 people every few songs during a concert. He assumed they were calling audibles, switching things up on the fly. But they weren’t. After inquiring among the band members about their huddles, he was told they were expressing gratitude and showing their audience that they actually liked each other.

Your audience knows when you’re creating something because you believe it versus because the content calendar demands it. They sense it. They feel it. And they respond differently.

So, what do we do now

Here’s what you need to ask yourself: Are you moving at Lightning McQueen speed because you have somewhere to go, or because you’re afraid of slowing down?

If it’s the latter, your storytelling won’t land. Without intention behind it, even well-produced content feels generic. There’s no point of view. The messaging doesn’t stick.

If it’s the former, you already have the answer. You know what you’re trying to accomplish. You’ve got the data to back it up. You understand your audience. You have a narrative voice that’s consistent and distinctly yours. Now you just need to commit to it.

Intention plus authenticity equals storytelling that actually moves people and culture. That’s how you build audiences that return to you. That’s how you earn attention in a world that’s learned to tune out everything else.

Article

Get Bold Work Out Into the World: How to Seize the Chaos Advantage

By Cameron Shields

After more than 15 years advising some of the world’s largest brands through reinventions, crises, cultural shifts and periods of profound uncertainty, I’ve learned something we’ve intuitively known all along:

The moments that feel riskiest are actually the moments that demand the most conviction. And playing it safe is the riskiest move of all.

That was the underlying theme I heard across the Croisette this week at Cannes Lions 2026.

Lou McEwan from McLaren shared a staggering statistic: 50% of McLaren’s audience is new over the last decade. That’s not an audience challenge. It’s a reminder that many of the assumptions we built brands around are quietly expiring.

On stage, Marisa Thalberg, EVP & Chief Customer and Marketing Officer of Catalyst Brands, put it even more directly: “I’ve been brave because actually I’m afraid not to be.” That sentiment surfaced repeatedly throughout Cannes.

Marisa Thalberg, EVP & Chief Customer and Marketing Officer of Catalyst Brands (left) and Ashley Graham at the Marketing Vanguard Excursion at Cannes Lions 2026.

Consumers are changing. The same tricks won’t work. Culture is fragmenting. Trust is harder to earn. Attention is harder to keep. And yet so much marketing is still optimized to avoid mistakes rather than create momentum.

One deeper challenge kept following me from stage to stage: The demand for performance has become performative, forcing some of the best marketers in the world into a cycle of retreat.

Somewhere along the way, organizations became obsessed with proving value now instead of creating it.

Yet the most compelling conversations at Cannes weren’t about choosing between brand and performance, reputation and growth, or creativity and data. They were about recognizing those are false choices.

In fact, many of the CMOs drawing the biggest crowds were making the same argument: risk isn’t something to mitigate. It’s a capability to build.

Which brings me to what may be the defining challenge facing modern marketers:

How do you get bold work approved and shipped?

The challenge isn’t conviction. It’s getting bold, smart work through the system.

At Cannes, FleishmanHillard and Contagious unveiled new research: The Chaos Advantage. The findings validated a tension many marketers have felt for years.

88% of marketing leaders believe bold work is more effective. Yet 78% say their organizations produce mostly safe work. The overwhelming majority of leaders already believe bold work wins.

But what does that tension actually mean in practice?

If bold work becomes controversial, the answer is the same: better intelligence.

One of the most fascinating conversations at Cannes came from Craig Brommers, reflecting on one of the most polarizing campaigns of the past year.

At launch, the infamous Sydney Sweeney-helmed campaign had helped drive a 25% increase in stock value.

Then Brommers’ high school daughter came home and told him, “Dad, you’re getting canceled on TikTok.”

The tension was real. But instead of reacting to the loudest voices, the team went to the data.

Traffic was up. Transactions were up. New customer acquisition was up.

They quickly commissioned research to understand how actual customers—not social media commentators—felt about the campaign.

That intelligence helped guide decisions that ultimately contributed to a 180% increase in stock value.

When asked what got them over the finish line, Brommers’ answer was simple:

“Real-time data allowed us to make the right decision not just for social media and outside voices, but for the business.”

That’s the difference between reckless risk and informed confidence.

Too often, risk management has evolved from an enabling function into a veto function.

Our research found that 66% of marketers say risk management blocks more than it enables. Bold work takes an average of seven days to approve. Safe work takes three.

That delay may seem manageable in isolation. But multiplied across approval cycles, cultural moments and competitive opportunities, it becomes a growth problem.

Almost half (42%) have watched competitors capture a cultural moment simply because they moved faster.

Most telling of all, 85% agree delayed decisions cause more damage than imperfect ones.

Yet many organizations continue to operate as if the greatest threat is making the wrong move.

The greater threat is making no move at all.

That same tension surfaced throughout Cannes:

In creator marketing, the conversation is no longer whether creators matter. The question is whether brands can loosen control enough to preserve the authenticity that makes creators effective in the first place.

In women’s sports, the opportunity isn’t simply increasing investment. It’s having the conviction to build fandom, tell richer stories, and establish credibility before the rest of the market catches up.

Different categories. Same challenge.

The organizations pulling ahead aren’t taking bigger risks. They’re making better decisions faster.

That’s why I believe the most important insight from Cannes isn’t that chaos exists. It’s that chaos can be an advantage.

For years, organizations have treated uncertainty as something to defend against. The brands creating disproportionate growth are treating it as an opening to challenge category conventions before competitors do.

An opening to build relevance while others are waiting for permission.

The irony is that cautious behavior doesn’t necessarily create safer outcomes.

Our new data showed bold brands experience backlash at roughly the SAME rate as cautious brands.

The difference is whether something meaningful was created in return.

So how do we seize the Chaos Advantage?

From what we’ve seen, it isn’t bigger budgets. It isn’t louder ideas. And it certainly isn’t fearlessness. It’s confidence built through evidence.

The organizations getting bold work into the world are doing three things differently.

✅ They distinguish perceived risk from actual risk.

✅ They use predictive intelligence to understand how stakeholders are likely to respond before decisions are made.

✅ They build approval processes designed to accelerate decision-making rather than slow it down.

This is where agencies must evolve. Our role isn’t simply to generate ideas. It’s to help clients move.

To expose where risk management has become a veto function instead of an enabling one.

To distinguish perceived risk from actual risk. To bring together reputation expertise, cultural fluency, predictive intelligence and creative ambition into a single decision-making framework.

To provide the evidence, guardrails and intelligence that transform “that’s risky” into “we can stand behind this.”

The brands moving fastest aren’t ignoring risk. They’re building systems that allow them to move confidently within it. That’s how bold work gets approved. That’s how bold work gets shipped.

And increasingly, that’s how growth happens.

Cameron Shields width= Cameron Shields is FleishmanHillard’s Global Head of Consumer, Brand Impact .

 
Article

The Action Gap: Leaders Know Bold Work Wins. They’re Just Not Moving Fast Enough.

June 23, 2026
By Colleen McTaggart

88% of marketing leaders believe bold work is what drives results, yet 78% admit their organizations mostly produce safe work. That’s the action gap.

We spotted this tension in our new Chaos Advantage research, based on a survey of 1,000 senior marketing and communications leaders around the world. The study reveals just how costly the gap between knowing and doing has become.

The gap doesn’t start in the brief. It starts in the room where the brief gets approved. Leaders don’t lack conviction. They lack cover. They want the big idea, but they want it armed with evidence, guardrails, and real-time intelligence. Because a great idea without a great argument is just an expensive mistake.

That’s the tension. We know bold works. But bold without proof feels reckless. And in an environment where every dollar is scrutinized, bravery needs backup.

But what does BOLD really look like?

On day one at the Cannes Lions International Festival of Creativity, humanity showed up everywhere in the winning work. Bold, unapologetic, and perhaps hidden in plain sight.

FleishmanHillard’s Global Head of Brand Impact Jim Joseph (second from left) and Chief Inclusion and Impact Officer Adrianne C. Smith appear at Inkwell Beach’s License to Lead: Reclaiming the Art of Storytelling.

Novartis’s Relax Your Tight End tapped into the very human fear of a colonoscopy, using humor to reframe an uncomfortable conversation and make it approachable.

Beat Cancer Off leaned into another undeniable human truth: people masturbate. Instead of avoiding that reality, it embraced it—boldly encouraging men to do more of it in the name of early cancer detection.

Viagra found a way around strict advertising regulations in China by creating hilariously blue branded products—sex innuendos brought to life. If we can’t talk about sex, let’s talk about sex without talking about it. A perfect example of creativity subverting the rules.

And then there was Not Manufactured Reviews – not polished copy or over-engineered messaging, but the real, messy, human words people use when they actually experience a product. Maybe the most innovative product demo of all.

The common thread? None of this work spoke to “consumers.” It spoke to people. And that’s the truth: we are humans first.

The same should be true of marketing. The best ideas don’t target consumers—they connect with humans.

But connection alone isn’t enough. To get brave work through the system, it needs both instinct and infrastructure. The human truth, backed by the right proof.

So maybe the question we should ask ourselves isn’t, “What will perform?”

It’s: What is the beautiful truth of being human here?

That’s where bravery lives. That’s where courage starts.

I’ll leave with something our client and Catalyst CMO Marisa Thalberg said on stage with Ashley Graham at The Female Quotient:

“Listen to what people are saying about your brand, look for the signals, and then blow wind onto them.”

So is the most audacious thing a marketer can do simply this: act on what we already know?

Because doing what we believe doesn’t require a secret formula. It requires something much simpler: humanity. The rest is just the proof to make others believe, too.

And maybe that’s the point. The best creative work doesn’t start with the “consumer” lens. It starts with the human lens.

Colleen McTaggart width= Colleen McTaggart is a global executive creative director based in Chicago.

 
Article

From Storytellers to Strategic Advisors: Sports Leaders Provide Valuable Lessons for Communicators

Monumental Sports & Entertainment’s Zack Leonsis (left) with FleishmanHillard’s Mitch Germann.

At this year’s Sports PR Summit, FleishmanHillard’s Chief Growth Officer Mitch Germann sat down with Monumental Sports & Entertainment (MSE) President of Media & New Enterprises Zach Leonsis for a wide-ranging conversation about multistakeholder audiences, transformation and the evolving role of communications.

The lessons extend far beyond arenas and game days. They reflect a broader reality facing communications leaders across industries and sectors: stakeholder audiences are multiplying, channels are fragmenting and the expectations placed on communicators have never been higher.

The Stakeholder Map Is More Complex Than Ever

Communicators often treat “the audience” as if they are singular.

In reality, today’s organizations operate within an ecosystem of stakeholders that may share a common interest but have very different priorities.

For sports organizations like MSE, that means communicating simultaneously with season ticket holders, casual fans, corporate partners, employees, players, league officials, elected leaders and local communities. While everyone may want the teams to succeed, their expectations of the organization differ dramatically.

The takeaway for communicators is clear: one narrative does not mean one message.

The strongest enterprise narratives are anchored by a consistent strategic story, but tailored for specific audiences, channels and moments. Communications teams increasingly must balance message consistency with audience relevance.

Narrative Ownership Has Become a Competitive Advantage

One of the most notable themes from the discussion was the growing importance of direct-to-consumer communications.

Leonsis emphasized that organizations cannot rely solely on third-party coverage and conversation to define who they are. In a world where social platforms amplify every opinion, organizations must proactively tell their own story or risk having others define it for them.

That means complementing earned media coverage with strong owned channels and a disciplined content strategy.

For communicators, the difference is in whether you are using the direct channels to your audiences strategically enough.The organizations that win attention today are often the ones that can move seamlessly between earned, owned and shared media environments.

Transformation Communications Requires More Than Announcements

Large-scale change initiatives often fail not because the strategy is flawed, but because stakeholders experience the transformation differently.

MSE’s Capital One Arena renovation provides a useful example. Different stakeholder groups care about different outcomes: players focus on facilities, corporate customers focus on experiences, fans focus on value, and civic leaders focus on economic impact.

The communications challenge lies in helping each audience understand what the transformation means for them.

Successful transformation communications requires sustained storytelling, message sequencing and audience-specific framing over months or years – not just a single launch moment.

Communications Leaders Must Operate Like Business Leaders

Perhaps the most important takeaway came in response to a simple question: What do business leaders need from communications teams today?

Leonsis’ answer wasn’t media relations. It wasn’t content creation.

It was partnership. He described communicators who understand the business, anticipate criticism, identify potential pitfalls, sharpen narratives and prepare leadership for inevitable scrutiny.

That’s a meaningful shift in expectations.

The most valuable communicators today are helping shape key decisions before they’re announced. They have a seat at the table.

In an environment defined by complexity, reputation risk and stakeholder scrutiny, communications has become a strategic operating function.

The Bottom Line

Sports has always been a pressure-tested environment for communications professionals. Every decision is scrutinized. Every stakeholder has a voice. Every narrative evolves in real time.

Today, communicators are being asked to manage more stakeholders, more channels and more scrutiny than ever before. Success depends on moving beyond traditional storytelling and embracing a broader role: strategic advisor, business partner and architect of trust.

Because in today’s environment, communications isn’t simply about telling the story.

It’s about helping shape the future of the organization behind it.

Article

The AI Readiness Gap Series: How to Build a Culture of Experimentation 

June 22, 2026
By Zack Kavanaugh

This is the third installment in a series on what it takes to close the gap between AI investment and tangible business impact.

In the first two pieces, I argued that AI adoption is fundamentally a people challenge – not a technology one. And I walked through why normalization – that initial work of building psychological safety and making AI feel less like a mandate from above – is where adoption begins.

But normalization is foundational, not sufficient for scaling and sustaining a transformation.

Listening builds trust, transparency creates permission and leaders modeling curiosity make space for people to be curious too.

Yet at a certain point, readiness must turn into action, and trust must move into experimentation – and that’s where things often stall for organizations.

What experimentation entails

Experimentation is not a single workshop or training session where people learn AI in theory and hope to apply it later.

Experimentation is the deliberate work of creating low-stakes opportunities for people to try AI with daily tasks, see what happens, share what they learn and let those discoveries shape how their team and the broader organization evolves.

Why experimentation stalls

Many organizations are making the mistake of treating experimentation like compliance.

They may schedule training, mandate it or expect it to happen in a structured, predictable way. Then they’re surprised when adoption remains stuck at the edges – concentrated among early adopters while the rest of the organization watches, wondering why this whole “AI thing” isn’t for them.

What tends to move people from curiosity to confidence is relevance. When people see how AI fits into their work, adoption stops feeling like a mandate being forced upon them and starts feeling like a tool they’re better off with than without.

Who influences experimentation

Experimentation doesn’t happen without active support – and managers’ involvement is often what determines whether it takes root or trails off.

  • Microsoft’s 2026 Work Trend Index found that when managers visibly use AI themselves – not just endorse it – employees report a 17-point lift in AI value, a 22-point lift in critical thinking and a 30-point lift in trust in AI tools.  

Manager visibility and support are the prerequisites for experimentation to become embedded in how work gets done.

And beyond that non-negotiable support, companies can deploy three strategies to accelerate experimentation:

1. Design low-stakes opportunities to try, not mandatory programs.

The difference between training and experimentation is permission to fail.

Experiments are designed to surface discovery. The expectation is learning – which includes failure. The point is to uncover insights that shape what comes next, not to prove mastery.

This changes how people engage. Instead of one-size-fits-all training, create role-specific challenges.

These don’t need to follow a single format.

  • Some organizations run week-long sprints where teams tackle a specific workflow problem with AI.  
  • Others build 15-minute “AI challenges” into team meetings – quick, low-pressure moments where teams tackle something together and debrief in real time.  
  • At FleishmanHillard, we’ve deployed “try this” email campaigns that highlight role-specific tips and best practices – paired with reinforcement in team meetings – and structured, cross-functional hackathons and competitions where groups solve real workflow problems with AI.  

Format matters, but less than the regularity with which you encourage and provide opportunities for your people to try something with their work, see what happens and reflect on it – moments where stakes stay low, the learning gets documented and momentum builds as people see peers discovering things that work.

2. Spread learning through peer voices and stories, not polished case studies.

Your AI wins will get turned into case studies – charts, metrics and messaging locked in to prove ROI. While these matter for leadership dashboards, they often read less like something a peer figured out and more like something the company or an expert achieved.

Peer stories work differently. They come from someone familiar and in a similar position. They’re messier, they show what someone was really thinking when they tried something and they make room for context – “Here’s where I am, here’s what I tried, here’s what happened and here’s what I’d do differently.”

That messiness is what makes them powerful. It signals that perfection isn’t the bar – and if someone who thinks like you and works like you figured something out – suddenly that same experiment feels possible for you too.

Those stories create permission in ways polished case studies never do – which is why leaders should find ways to share these.

This could take several forms.

  • Create internal campaigns where teams share what they tried that week and what they learned – misfires included – via Slack threads or Teams channels.  
  • Host show-and-tell sessions where someone walks through how they solved a problem, where they got stuck, what went wrong – and invites the room to help troubleshoot next steps.  
  • Or establish dedicated architect and ambassador roles – like we’ve done at FleishmanHillard – where builders and super users experiment alongside their teams, share what’s working and what isn’t, and create permission for others to do the same. 

And with peer stories, tone is everything. “I tried this and it didn’t work, but here’s what I learned” is infinitely more relatable than, “Here’s how our company is transforming productivity and driving efficiency.” One invites personal experimentation – and the other signals compliance.

3. Build informal peer-to-peer momentum instead of formal training.

Training is periodic and linear. Peer-to-peer learning is fluid, constant and evolves as your organization does.

Both are valuable, and you should deploy each as needed, but peer-to-peer learning builds adaptive capacity – the kind that compounds and grows alongside your culture.

When you create simple mechanisms for ongoing peer-to-peer learning – “What I learned this week” rituals in team meetings, Teams threads where people drop quick tips, debrief huddles where someone walks through how they applied AI to a real use case, side conversations where a peer shares a shortcut – learning stops being something that happens to people and starts being something they do together.

At FleishmanHillard, we’ve made this easier by building off-the-shelf training resources and templates that any role can use or adapt for their teams – simple scaffolding that removes friction and makes peer sharing more accessible.

We’ve witnessed firsthand that those moments compound, and they reshape how your organization thinks about discovery and experimentation.

They also serve as a continuous feedback loop. You may learn more about what people care about, what confuses them and what would help them in a few weeks of informal conversations than from your annual survey.

On top of all that, assuming you’re following through on what you hear, your people will feel like their voices shaped what comes next – because they did.

How you know experimentation is becoming part of your culture

Experimentation is a continuous, messy, non-linear process – not a single moment. Here are three signals you’re heading in the right direction:

  • AI is being applied to everyday work. Analytics and team check-ins show employees testing AI with real tasks.  
  • Learnings are being shared. Examples, wins and failures surface in meetings and peer showcases. The conversation has shifted from, “how do I use this?” to, “here’s what I tried and here’s what I learned.”  
  • Confidence is building. The tone in surveys shifts from, “I’m not sure where to start” to, “I’m figuring out where this could help.” People are getting more and more curious and taking small, concentrated risks because they feel safe doing so. 

Building the cultural conditions for experimentation

Right now, organizational culture is roughly twice as powerful as individual mindset in determining whether AI delivers value.

The organizations accelerating adoption are the ones making room for people to learn and figure out what this technology means for their work – where people feel safe trying them, failure is a learning opportunity, peer discoveries shape strategy and use becomes personal enough to stick.

So, the question for leaders right now is less about the technology itself and more about whether you’ve created the conditions for everyone to use it. And if you haven’t normalized this shift and built experimentation into how your organization operates, the answer will always be no – no matter how good the tools are.