Employee Login

Enter your login information to access the intranet

Enter your credentials to access your email

Reset employee password

Article

Five Ways to Build Community Reputation and Trust 

October 29, 2025
By Judith Rowland and Bob Miller

Across boardrooms and communications teams, one word keeps coming up: “whiplash.” It’s how leaders describe the constant upheaval caused by today’s shifting geopolitical and policy landscape. But who really feels the sting at the end of this whip?

Often, it’s local communities. These are the places where products are made, where factories stand and where families depend on steady work. Companies might have reserves or pricing power to weather storms, but for many communities, the options are limited. The challenges facing local economies in 2025 are just the latest round in a long struggle—one shaped by changing populations, economic swings and shifting industries that can erode tax bases, schools and a community’s ability to attract talent and investment.

Moving beyond the old playbook 

Given this intensity, the old playbook for community relations—writing checks to nonprofits, sponsoring little league teams, hiring locally—just isn’t enough anymore. Communities need more from their corporate neighbors.

This is a real opportunity. Companies can build true “community reputation” by investing in local relationships, creating value for both the business and the community. When companies focus on community reputation, they go beyond just earning a license to operate. They earn a license to grow. Strong partnerships between companies and the communities where they operate fuel mutual success. Communities thrive when companies show up and invest meaningfully. 

Why reputation and trust matter 

In today’s competitive environment, companies race to show their commitment to U.S. jobs and supply chains. But earning trust at the local level takes more than promises of big investments or massive new facilities. It takes consistent, long-term and clearly visible action. 

Reputation and trust are the keys that open doors. They help companies navigate politics, overcome barriers and tell a compelling “Made-in-America” story about their facilities, their people and the future they’re building with their communities. 

In fact, as we approach the end of Manufacturing Month in the U.S., it shouldn’t also mean an end to a focus on supporting and celebrating the impact manufacturing has on local communities. A strong community reputation is an on-going, strategic business differentiator helping companies:    

  • Retain and attract top local talent 
  • Turn neighbors into lifelong customers 
  • Protect the business when controversy strikes 
  • Build a base of authentic advocates who will amplify your story far beyond your own channels 

A blueprint for building community reputation and trust 

  1. Listen first to build relationships.
    Listening is the foundation of strong relationships. It helps you find ways to contribute that genuinely strengthen your reputation and support the community’s long-term health.
  1. Craft bespoke plans for each community. There is no one-size-fits-all model for building community reputation. Rather, the partnership must be driven by the needs of the community. A small, rural town may have vastly different needs than a large city with many well-known employers. Companies must recognize a community as a system and understand where they are best placed to offer support.
  1. Be present and consistent.
    Trust is built by showing up—again and again. Do not wait until you’re in the midst of a challenging labor negotiations cycle or other business threat to start thinking about building reputation. Attend town halls, fundraisers, council meetings and economic summits. Consistent presence demonstrates real commitment. Miss these moments, and you risk losing momentum that’s hard to regain – or worse, making your actions appear self-serving and transactional.
  1. Commit enterprise-wide.
    Building a strong reputation takes buy-in from the whole company. Align your communications, philanthropy, public affairs, workforce programs and government partnerships around a shared mission that advances business goals and benefits residents. Start by mapping stakeholders, aligning priorities and standardizing programs for mutual success.
  1. Communicate transparently
    Listening is only the beginning. Authentic, regular communication is the payoff that matters. People don’t trust the company they never hear from, or the one that refuses to comment. Leverage a wide range of drumbeat tactics, potentially including newsletters, community meetings and local media to highlight your impact. And don’t go silent when things get tough. Sharing both successes and challenges—like job cuts or construction delays—shows transparency and builds trust. When stakeholders know the context and your plans, they’re more likely to become advocates, even during hard times.

A lasting commitment to communities 

Building or expanding in a new community isn’t just about jobs or ribbon cuttings. It’s a vote of confidence in American workers and communities, a promise in our shared future and the first step in creating local reputations that pay dividends for companies, communities and the country. 

FleishmanHillard has helped Fortune 1000 companies build community reputation strategies that deliver proven results. To learn more, contact [email protected]. 

“Judith Judith Rowland is a senior vice president in the Public Affairs and Engagement group and also serves as global sustainability lead for the food, agriculture and beverage (FAB) sector. She helps clients establish strategies for advancing community reputation and social impact, set measurable goals and communicate their progress with the stakeholders that matter most.

Bob Miller is a managing supervisor in FleishmanHillard’s Detroit office, where he supports clients across manufacturing, energy, finance, healthcare, and higher education. He’s committed to developing programs and stories that build trust and strengthen connections between companies and their employees, customers, and communities.

 
Article

Understanding the GLP-1 Consumer: Pairing AI and Consumer Behavior Research to Map Potential Impact on Food, Nutrition and Innovation 

By Allison Koch

Obesity medications have created a new type of consumer with unique needs. These consumers are not only spending their money differently but also spending less on groceries while still figuring out how to integrate their new diet into their homes and social lives.  

Food companies, as well as health professionals and dietitians like me, are seeking to better understand the GLP-1 user and how best to support them, especially as the medications become more affordable and accessible.  

Consumer research is already showing us where there are opportunities to support GLP-1 users. For example: 

GLP-1 users are tech-savvy, diverse and often rely on online communities – underscoring a shift in how Americans get health advice.

Moving beyond the numbers with AI 

But how do we really get behind the statistics and inside the mind of a GLP-1 user?  

We created a synthetic audience—an AI-driven amalgamation of many users based on all of the research we could put into the tool—to explore their thoughts and use them as a springboard for discussion and inspiration. Our proprietary tool unveiled potentially unintended consequences medication users’ decisions may have, including how their dietary habits and behaviors could influence how and what their family eats. More broadly, their habits and decisions will drive how product innovation happens and how the food supply chain is impacted.

And our synthetic audience showed us clearly that:  

  1. One size fits none: the most effective engagement – whether clinical or product – starts with understanding and targeting micro-segments.  
  1. Rethink education with reach: health care professionals (HCPs) – preferably led by registered dietitians (RDNs) who are experts in connecting the food and healthcare sectors – as well as the broader healthcare and food industries need to embed in GLP-1 users’ ecosystems as most build health knowledge outside traditional channels (on YouTube, Reddit, TikTok and with peer groups). 
  1. Anticipate ripple effects: HCPs (and the industry where appropriate) need to help patients navigate this cascade with empathy, flexibility and real-world solutions beyond just nutrition effects.  

What industry leaders are saying 

With these insights in hand, earlier this month I challenged three industry professionals to apply our findings to their work in front of a crowded room at the recent Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics annual Food and Nutrition Conference & Expo (FNCE). Each panelist brought a unique perspective to the table, discussing how they work with and reach GLP-1 medication users as well as key considerations and implications for practice and the broader healthcare, food and beverage community. 

How far does the GLP-1 impact reach? My colleague and Audience Strategy and Data Innovation expert Amanda Patterson said, “The rise in GLP-1 medications is fundamentally reshaping not just how people eat, but what and how much they buy at the grocery store. Beyond the individual, these changes ripple out to families and social circles. Many users say their household food routines (grocery lists, meal prep, holiday or social meals) are being reworked to accommodate their new eating patterns.” 

How should the food industry respond? For long term implications if this trend continues, community nutrition dietitian and GLP-1 user Summer Kessel shared, “I’m hopeful we are course correcting from the days of massive portion sizes and novelty products over nutrition. However, I’m a little worried that if people rely too heavily on ‘low-calorie’ processed foods instead of balanced meals, they risk missing out on essential nutrients.” 

Can the right nutrition messages get through the marketing hype? Founder of the Better Nutrition Program and RDN Ashley Koff shared, “We can use awareness of GLP-1 medications to introduce the public to weight-health hormones and how they regulate numerous functions in the body known collectively as ‘weight health.’ In doing this, dietitians can expand the reach of GLP-1, GIP beyond medications and help people learn to assess and as indicated, optimize their own hormones – whether they ever use a medication or not.” 

Rethinking food and health communications 

As GLP-1s continue to change daily routines and expectations, helping consumers make the right decisions to stay healthy but also being present with family and friends at meals and other food-based activities will test how we communicate about food and health.  

Combining insights from AI, research and lived experience allows us to reach solutions faster and understand not just what works, but why.  

For more information on these insights and other key learnings from FNCE, contact Allison at [email protected]

Allison koch width= Allison Koch MS, RD, CSSD, LDN is a vice president in FleishmanHillard’s Chicago office, where she provides nutrition communications counsel for clients. A registered dietitian with more than 20 years of experience, she’s passionate about helping brands connect science and storytelling to inspire healthier choices and stronger consumer trust.

 
Article

Communications Is an ROI Multiplier for Global Sports Sponsorships

October 22, 2025

Few things unite the world in real time like sport. The Super Bowl, Olympic and Paralympic Games, and FIFA World Cup don’t just crown champions: they define reputations. For brands, these global moments are high-stakes arenas where trust, attention, and billions in sponsorship dollars are on the line.

The brands that truly win know that communications is the multiplier. They connect event moments to human stories — for employees, customers, partners, and communities — while protecting reputation under the brightest spotlight.

So what does putting communications at the center really mean? It starts with leadership alignment across the C-suite to operate in lockstep, from strategy and storytelling to scenario planning and real-time response. The most effective teams turn visibility into value and pressure into performance investors can measure.

In the latest USC Annenberg Sports Relevance Report, FleishmanHillard President and CEO J.J. Carter and Chief Client Officer Emily Frager explore how the new sports communications playbook must include:

  • A gameplay to help brands operate at “event speed” on the ground.
  • The blueprint for integrated, measurable, reputation-safe activations.
  • How to prepare for the upcoming calendar of record-breaking global tournaments

Click the image below to read the full USC Sports Report to see how brands are turning attention into trust, and participation into performance or visit USC Annenberg’s site here.

Article

Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution: AI’s Role in Crisis, Issues and Risk Management

October 14, 2025
By Matt Rose and Alexander Lyall

Everyone’s talking about the promise of artificial intelligence. For crisis, issues and risk managers, that promise isn’t theoretical anymore. It’s already changing the game. The speed, scale and complexity of today’s challenges demand more than human effort alone. We need tools that sharpen judgment, spot risks sooner, simulate outcomes and move faster than we ever could on our own.

At FleishmanHillard, we call this Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution. It’s the balance of seasoned, human counsel with the foresight, scale and speed of AI. When used well, AI doesn’t replace human judgment, it strengthens it. AI compresses timelines, expands context, flags risks earlier and gives leaders the clarity they need under pressure.

Here’s how we’re putting this advantage into practice at FleishmanHillard, using trusted frameworks and strong data governance to help clients address crises, issues and risk with confidence.

AI for Early Warning

AI is becoming an essential early warning system. It examines global news, regulatory updates, and social activity to detect emerging topics and weak signals before they escalate. By analyzing conversations across markets, languages, and, it connects jurisdictions patterns that siloed teams might miss, with speed and breadth that today’s lean human teams cannot match.

It can also track how issues are likely to evolve and flag pressure points like upcoming regulations, activist campaigns, or viral moments. In addition, it can be pointed to anticipate when separate concerns may converge, adding complexity to timing, messaging, audience response and stakeholder engagement. This kind of foresight helps leaders act early, communicate clearly and stay ahead before critical moments hit.

AI for Stakeholder Simulation

Spotting a potential issue is one thing. Understanding how different audiences might respond is the next. Employees may question values. Regulators may focus on compliance. Investors may worry about financial impact. Customers may be concerned about reliability.

AI helps make this analysis possible through FleishmanHillard’s SAGE Synthetic Audiences. These simulations, built on polling data, demographics, and behavioral insights, let teams pressure-test messaging in real time.

AI can also model how a story might spread. Coverage could draw regulatory attention, spark activism, or open the door for competitors. With this foresight, teams can weigh options early, decide how to respond, and plan outreach in the right order.

AI for Story Forecasting

Reporters rarely work in isolation. Their previous stories, tone, and interview style often foreshadow how a new piece might unfold. AI can analyze this public data to forecast likely narratives, giving teams time to scenario-plan and prepare fact-based responses.

In one recent case, the FleishmanHillard team leveraged AI to generate a full-length draft of a potential investigative article based on a reporter’s in-depth inquiry, their past work, and facts they were likely to uncover. The projection closely matched the final story, serving as a clear model for the client and FH counselors to work against and affording weeks to prepare. Together, they aligned messaging, cleared responses and rehearsed scenarios. When the article ran, the team responded with focus and confidence, avoiding both unwanted attention and business disruption.

Click Above for More From the FleishmanHillard Crisis Team

AI for Crisis Content Management

Crisis response is rarely just one statement. It quickly becomes a growing stack of analytics and materials: standby statements, employee letters, investor scripts, customer updates, government briefings, media talking points, FAQs and social posts. Managing it all can become chaotic, especially with lengthy approval chains.

AI tools like FH Crisis Navigator help bring order. Acting as a virtual program manager, it adapts approved language for different audiences with speed and consistency. Using this tool, a crisis counselor can generate drafts, maintain version control, and keep updates aligned across every document. This reduces drift, speeds up approvals, embeds expert counsel, and keeps teams focused. So, when leadership needs to respond – whether to investors, regulators, customers, or the public – everything is already in place and ready for review.

AI for Scenario-Based Training

Preparation has always been essential to crisis readiness. But traditional tabletop exercises often fall short of real-world complexity. AI-powered platforms like the FleishmanHillard Crisis Simulation Lab raise the bar. Run by experienced facilitators, these simulations evolve in real time based on participant decisions. They introduce realistic challenges like media calls, stakeholder emails and viral posts, all tailored to the organization’s sector and geography.

Simulations can launch in hours instead of weeks, making them useful for both training and real-time strategy support. Structured feedback focuses on fact management, stakeholder engagement, and adaptability – building the muscle memory teams need when reputations are on the line.

AI for Campaign Risk Screening

Crises don’t always come from the outside. Sometimes a product launch, influencer partnership, or purpose-driven campaign can spark backlash, trigger scrutiny, or misfire in a volatile moment.

FH Risk Radar helps teams assess these risks before campaigns go live. It reviews concepts against regulatory guidance, cultural signals, public sentiment, and platform-specific challenges. The system scores ideas across dimensions like reputational exposure, influencer fit, message durability, and cultural sensitivity. Instead of a simple go-or-no-go call, teams get a full risk profile and clear mitigation strategies. This shifts review from a late-stage checkpoint to a strategic advantage.

From Promise to Practice

For communicators, risk leaders, and executives, AI is no longer a future promise. It’s a working tool, a strategic coach, and a force multiplier available to improve outcomes now. It surfaces early warning signs, simulates reactions, forecasts narratives, manages complex content, powers training, and screens campaigns. It delivers sharper, faster options for decision makers when every move counts.

AI’s role in crisis and risk management will only grow more sophisticated. But the message today is simple: the technology is here and can be applied to create immediate value. The leaders who use it will be better prepared to protect reputation in high-stakes moments.

At FleishmanHillard, we’re applying these tools every day to help clients anticipate challenges, navigate uncertainty, and emerge stronger. At the heart of it is Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution – the combination of trusted human counsel and the structured speed of AI. Together, they help organizations make better decisions, faster.

Crisis Team width=

Matt Rose (top) – Americas Lead for Crisis, Issues & Risk Management: Matt is an SVP & Senior Partner in New York with more than 30 years’ experience in advising organizations on crisis and issues management, risk mitigation, and reputation recovery. He has guided companies through reputational crises, labor issues, regulatory challenges, ESG controversies, and high-profile litigation.
Alex Lyall – Lead, Risk Management, AI & Innovation: Alex is an SVP & Partner in New York with more than 15 years of experience in crisis communications, issues management, preparedness, and risk management, working across industries. As part of the leadership team, Alex will help define best practices, shape go-to-market strategies, and scales solutions, with a focus on AI integration and talent development.
 

FH Guidelines for AI in Crisis, Issues, and Risk Management Applications

At FleishmanHillard, we apply artificial intelligence with purpose, not hype. In crisis, issues, and risk management, that means combining human expertise and experience with proven frameworks, proprietary technology, necessary confidentiality, and responsible guardrails to help organizations respond with speed, confidence, and control.
During a crisis, there is no substitute for seasoned judgment. AI can surface information, suggest language, or model scenarios, but it cannot navigate the nuance of legal implications, stakeholder dynamics, or reputational risk in real time. That takes seasoned counselors who have sat in the room, weighed the tradeoffs, and led under pressure. When the stakes are high, experience is not just helpful, it is essential.
That is why each FleishmanHillard application of AI in the Crisis, Issues and Risk Management Practice is anchored in three principles:
  • Experienced crisis counselors remain at the center of each use case, ensuring that technology enhances but never replaces human judgment.
  • Our systems are designed in secure, quality-assured environments that safeguard client information and uphold rigorous ethical standards.
  • AI is embedded within tested frameworks and workflows, allowing teams to move faster without sacrificing accuracy, accountability, or trust.
This disciplined approach ensures AI strengthens decision-making rather than creating new risks. With FleishmanHillard, organizations embrace innovation in crisis, issues, and risk management with confidence, knowing that innovation never comes at the expense of accuracy, ethics, or trust.

 

 
Article

From Risk to Resilience: How Communicators Lead in an Unforgiving Landscape

September 10, 2025
By Matt Rose, Rebecca Rausch, Geoff Mordock and Alexander Lyall

Organizations today operate in an unforgiving risk environment. Polarization, regulatory scrutiny, cyberattacks, employee activism, and the viral speed of social media can turn a manageable issue into a full-scale crisis in moments. In this reality, communications leaders are no longer just brand stewards, they are trusted advisors, risk strategists, and builders of resilience.

To succeed in a crisis situation, communicators need more than reactive playbooks. They need intelligence, agility, integration, resilience, and humanity – all powered by the smart use of data and technology.

Corporate Affairs

Intelligence That Anticipates Risk

The organizations that weather crises most effectively are those that spot and appropriately manage risks before they fully evolve into something more significant. They have their eyes on what could potentially impact their organization’s reputation and actively identify narratives that could have a negative impact. As part of this, modern communicators must constantly track evolving narratives across media, niche platforms, stakeholder conversations, political arenas, and global markets.

The real advantage lies in interpreting those signals and helping leadership act before they become tomorrow’s headlines. Data and AI can speed and amplify this work, scanning massive volumes of information, detecting patterns, and separating noise from genuine risk. When combined with sharp human judgment, this creates a forward-looking posture rooted in confidence and clarity.

Agility in High-Stakes Moments

When a crisis breaks, speed matters – but speed without clarity compounds risk. Success depends on clear escalation protocols, tested frameworks, and disciplined message architectures, all backed by real-time monitoring that provides actionable insight.

Technology can accelerate this execution, from dashboards that track sentiment minute-by-minute to AI tools that help refine messaging across multiple channels. But the true differentiator is preparation, empowerment, and the ability of communicators to move quickly – and credibly – under pressure.

Integrated Stakeholder Engagement

Crises never unfold in a single arena. Investors, employees, regulators, customers, policymakers, and activists all bring distinct expectations, biases and communication habits. Communicators must serve as the connective tissue, ensuring messages are consistent while tailoring tone, content, and channels for each audience.

Data-driven insights make this engagement sharper and more precise, helping teams understand shifting sentiment and adapt in real time. Still, integration is as much about leadership alignment and discipline as it is about technology.

Resilience as a Strategic Asset

In an era where headlines move markets and digital narratives shape reputations instantly, crisis readiness is more than a defensive shield – it’s a strategic advantage. Building resilience means embedding preparedness into governance, leadership development, and organizational culture.

It means pressure-testing through simulations, capturing lessons learned, and evolving systems as new risks emerge. Our approach emphasizes resilience over reaction – helping organizations withstand disruption, respond with clarity, and emerge stronger, with reputations enhanced by how they led through the storm.

Leading With Humanity and Purpose

At the center of every crisis are people – employees seeking reassurance, customers demanding transparency, communities expecting accountability. Effective communicators lead with humanity, balancing facts with empathy and aligning every message to a clear sense of purpose.

Technology can deliver speed and scale, but trust is earned through consistent principles, visible actions, and authentic communication.

Looking Ahead

Today’s complex risk environment is a constant test of resilience and trust. To meet that challenge, communications teams must anticipate emerging risks, act with clarity in high-stakes moments, engage stakeholders with precision, and lead with empathy at every step.

Data and AI offer powerful tools to sharpen judgment and accelerate execution, but the heart of effective crisis management remains human. That belief drives our work: blending insight, preparation, and humanity with the best tools available, so organizations aren’t just prepared to withstand disruption – they are ready to lead through it.

About the Authors

From Left to Right: Matt Rose, Rebecca Rausch, Geoff Mordock and Alex Lyall

Matt Rose – Americas Lead for Crisis, Issues & Risk Management: Matt is an SVP & Senior Partner in New York with more than 30 years’ experience in advising organizations on crisis and issues management, risk mitigation, and reputation recovery. He has guided companies through reputational crises, labor issues, regulatory challenges, ESG controversies, and high-profile litigation.

• Rebecca Rausch – Lead, Crisis Communications: An SVP & Partner in the St. Louis office, Rebecca has more than 25 years of experience in crisis and issues management, guiding major brands and executives through complex challenges. With strategic insight and decisive action, she oversees all facets of crisis and reputation management from preparedness to recovery.

• Geoff Mordock – Lead, Issues Management: Geoff is an SVP & Senior Partner based in Orange County and brings more than 25 years of experience helping organizations manage and shape corporate reputation, including navigating significant crises and issues through critical moments.

• Alex Lyall – Lead, Risk Management, AI & Innovation: Alex is an SVP & Partner in New York with more than 15 years of experience in crisis communications, issues management, preparedness, and risk management,working across industries. As part of the leadership team, Alex will help define best practices, shape go-to-market strategies, and scales solutions, with a focus on AI integration and talent development.

Article

The Answer Engine Era Is Here

August 20, 2025
By Ellie Tuck

We are living through another fundamental shift in how people discover brands. But we’ve seen this pattern before: the move from analog to web, from search to social. Each time, the brands that adapted early gained lasting advantages. Now we are seeing the rise of LLM-powered answer engines and the emergence of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), a strategy that leverages AI to optimize a brand’s visibility and reputation in answer engine results.

The numbers tell the story: over half of Google results now include a generative response. AI agents and chatbots are increasingly becoming the first stop for people seeking recommendations, advice or information. If your audience is already there and you are not auditing how your brand shows up, you are missing a critical piece of the discovery puzzle.

How we are navigating the shift

While the fundamentals of trust and quality content remain, GEO redefines how they are executed. Analysing tools like ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity shows that these models lean heavily on what is already in the public domain, especially high-trust, earned media sources.

In response, we have had to build custom tools to get under the hood of how a brand is being interpreted. These tools allow us to see where a client is showing up, how they are being described, and how that compares to others in their space.

This new landscape also demands a new level of precision from our creative campaigns. We are asking more specific questions. Is our messaging backed by the right expert validation? Is our content tailored for the types of media AI models trust? Is our phrasing distinctive enough to be picked up by both machines and people?

This is where creativity and technical precision now overlap. Our teams are building synthetic AI audiences to test ideas earlier and using our FH Fusion platform to assemble virtual focus groups that inform smarter, faster decision-making.

A practical framework for influence

Our approach is led by audience behavior. That has always been our starting point in PR, and it is no different in the world of AI.

To influence how LLMs respond, we focus on a few key levers:

  • Earned coverage in high-trust sources
  • Structured storytelling to make key messages clear
  • Cross-channel reinforcement of the right signals
  • Consistency, because LLMs rely on pattern recognition

This work is complex, and the environment is not static. But an adaptable, audience-led strategy puts us in the best position to succeed.

What this means for our industry

The implications are broad. Business leaders need to get smart about how these models make decisions, guided by real data, not guesswork. Answer engine visibility should become a core KPI, not just for communications teams, but for growth.

But reputational risk is a major factor. We are already seeing AI tools surface outdated or outright false content about brands. Because what an LLM says feels factual to users, our role shifts from defending a single source of truth to shaping the entire ecosystem that AI learns from. This is nuanced work, but it is also where we can have the most significant impact.

No one has all the answers yet. The models are evolving, the sources they trust are shifting, and the tactics that work today may not work tomorrow. But the brands that start auditing their answer engine presence now will have a significant advantage over those who wait.

The communications industry has adapted to every major shift in how people consume information. This one is no different, except for the speed at which it is happening. The question is not whether your brand will need a GEO strategy; it is how quickly you can build one that works. We’ve adapted before, and we’ll do it again.

Ellie Tuck width= Ellie Tuck is an SVP & Partner and Executive Creative Director based in New York.

 
Article

A New Approach to Modern Comms: What It Takes to Win in a World Defined by Uncertainty

August 19, 2025
By Michael Moroney, Elizabeth Cook and Michelle Mulkey

FleishmanHillard launches The Modern Comms Calibration ahead of the 2026 communications planning season

Uncertainty is no longer a passing phase. It’s the new default for business. From fragmented media and cultural volatility to shifting regulation and political polarization, change is now constant. Communicators have been on the frontlines of this evolution, and as a result, communications leaders have earned a seat at the table.

Over the last several years, the function has grown in importance, with communications teams tirelessly managing stakeholder expectations, protecting reputation, and influencing business strategy, moving far beyond writing traditional PR plans. But as we adapt to an environment of never-ending uncertainty, the bar is shifting again.

High-performing teams have built systems to manage constant crises and reclaimed time for proactive, reputation-defining strategies. They’re building messaging and thought leadership POVs that spotlight what business leaders have to offer by leveraging audience data and emerging media trends to drive focused, relevant conversations. And the teams making this pivot, from the trenches to the track, are amplifying their competitive differentiation and driving results for the business.

So how do we move more teams further, faster, toward today’s modern PR performance? The challenge is that many communications functions are consumed by the present. They’re caught up in today’s stories, issues, and shifts with too little time, space, or direction to focus on what’s next. Most teams do not lack effort. What they often lack is a shared picture of where they are going and how they will get there.

Winning starts with a function organized around today’s realities: decisive, focused, and able to navigate a complex, ever-evolving landscape. Leadership, both within communications and across the business, must set a clear direction and hold teams accountable.

To help clients assess where they stand and where to focus, we developed The Modern Comms Calibration.  It’s a fast, practical diagnostic that assesses a communications team’s maturity and provides a clear path forward. We use it to align leaders, sharpen priorities, and accelerate results.

We have worked alongside some of the world’s most ambitious companies to modernize their communications operations. Coming out of these partnerships, we’ve identified six characteristics that set high-performing teams apart:

  • Business Acumen: The most effective communications leaders are fluent in  business strategy. They use that understanding to drive messaging, shape campaigns, and ensure the function’s outputs ladder directly to growth and performance goals.
  • Relevance and Authenticity: Winning organizations are direct and clear in how they communicate. They speak in a tone that reflects their values and connect with the culture in ways that are meaningful, not performative.
  • Audience Orientation: They know who matters most, and they adapt accordingly. These teams actively engage stakeholders where they are—across new platforms,  channels, and  formats—with an understanding that traditional assumptions about audiences no longer apply.
  • Risk and Opportunity Readiness: These teams don’t just respond quickly. They prepare early. They invest in systems to monitor risk, rehearse scenarios, and are ready to act when the moment requires it. And when opportunity presents itself, they are often first to move.
  • Data Driving Decisions: High-performing teams define success in business terms, not just media metrics. They track performance and feed those insights into planning and prioritization. They understand what is working, why it’s working, and where to push further.
  • AI Adoption: They are not waiting for AI to become a mandate. They are already embedding it into workflows. From message testing and stakeholder modeling to drafting and deployment, they are using AI to drive scale and precision without sacrificing trust.

These six areas are not aspirational. They are actionable. They reflect what we have seen work in the real world. And they  guide teams toward impact, not just improvement.

Communicators are under pressure. But they are also uniquely positioned to lead. With the right structure, direction, and tools, they can be the difference between reacting and winning. We’ve seen it happen. And we’re ready to help others make it real.

Article

Leading Through Complexity: What Higher Ed Communicators Are Saying

July 25, 2025

What one word best describes your day-to-day work? 

That was the icebreaker posed by FleishmanHillard’s Sarah Francomano, who hosted and moderated a candid dinner conversation among senior higher ed communications and marketing leaders. Responses like “firefighter,” “pivot” and “controlling chaos” weren’t said for dramatic effect—they reflected the current state of the higher ed landscape. The group all concurred that leading communications in higher education today is intensely complex, often chaotic and always high stakes.

The conversation was twofold, starting with discussions around what senior leaders are currently seeing in higher education. Then, the conversation moved to what’s next and how higher-ed professionals can leverage AI and other emerging tools to support them in their roles.

The Current Reality: Complexity and Constant Pressure

Communications leaders in higher education are facing unprecedented, often competing demands—with the stakes higher than ever. A single misstep can trigger consequences ranging from trustee backlash to federal scrutiny. Plus, in an environment where issues are deeply personal and highly visible, it’s often the job of the communications team not just to respond, but to cut through the noise, determine whose voices matter most in a given moment and identify which relationships need to be prioritized in order to guide the institution through crisis or change.

Participants shared their experiences managing a high volume of inquiries on a consistent basis from students, parents, alumni, donors, faculty, media and the general public on issues pertaining to their schools. One participant described a case where their team received more than 10,000 emails in response to a global crisis. After sorting through all of the messages, they found that only a small fraction came from individuals actually affiliated with the institution. It was a telling example of how the general public’s perspective does not always reflect the opinions of key stakeholders who have an impact on a university.

Others spoke about the weight of deciding when—and whether—to issue public statements. Choosing to speak up on a cultural or political moment may be the right call in one case, but it often sets expectations for the next moment. The act of staying silent can also become a message, leaving universities at risk of receiving backlash. One communications leader noted that even a simple interaction with a reporter can draw the institution into a larger story, whether they want to be part of it or not.

Enrollment also surfaced as a key pressure point. Some schools are dealing with declining numbers and budget shortfalls; others are seeing higher-than-expected demand. Several attendees commented on the long-term risks of tuition discounting—the idea that while short-term financial aid boosts can help meet yield goals, they may also chip away at perceived brand value over time. Once an institution begins competing on price, it becomes difficult to return to a different model.

The Future: How AI is Shaping Strategic Readiness

Toward the end of dinner, the conversation shifted to some of the solutions now available to address the challenges that come with working in higher education. The group was introduced to a live AI-powered crisis simulation, led by FleishmanHillard’s Alex Lyall. The FH Crisis Simulation Lab draws from real-world crisis events and FH simulation methodologies and presents users with unfolding scenarios in the form of projected stakeholder reactions. Unlike traditional simulations, which are static, this AI-powered tool is dynamic in nature, responding to the real-time decisions of participants by evolving the crisis scenario to reflect how stakeholders might respond.

When the demo immersed participants in a campus protest scenario, the group decided to put the tool through its paces and selected the most aggressive response, forcing demonstrators to disband by a set deadline. The result generated backlash, escalation and reputational fallout in the form of emails, social media posts and media coverage, mirroring how a crisis team would experience these types of situations.

Participants were quick to note how well the tool captured the complexity and pace of an actual crisis. The AI agent mapped out the often-conflicting reactions across stakeholder groups—students, faculty, alumni, media, donors—and showed how quickly one decision can lead to a cascade of consequences. Later in the simulation, when the team chose how to correct course, the tool was prompted to generate internal and external holding statements that offered strong, usable drafts that could be easily customized to fit the voice of an institution.

Participants saw clear potential for the AI agent as both a training and planning resource—especially in conversations with boards or leadership teams. It provided a structured, precedent-informed way to explore how crisis scenarios might unfold, helping teams evaluate why one communications path might be more effective than another.

Alex shared that while this particular demo was generic, the FH Crisis Simulation Lab can be tailored to reflect each school’s culture, governance structure and audience. Even those in the room who were skeptical about AI said they could see its value in this kind of application—not to replace human instincts, but to sharpen and support them.

Going Forward: Navigating Reputational Complexities

The evening was a chance to connect with peers, swap stories and explore fresh ideas about what the future of higher ed looks like. It was an invigorating conversation that left many in the room feeling energized and inspired.

Higher ed communications may be complex, sometimes chaotic and full of tough calls—but it doesn’t have to be faced alone.

Article

The Friends You Never Knew You Needed: Why IT and Communications Must Team Up

July 24, 2025
By Scott Radcliffe

Trust is at the heart of every successful organization. In today’s digital landscape, that trust is built—and sometimes shattered—by how well you protect the data on your network. Reputation is hard-won and easily lost, making it a favorite pressure point for cybercriminals and regulators alike.

Over the past several years, threat actors have shifted tactics. Rather than relying solely on operational disruptions driven by ransomware, groups like Lapsu$ have gone as far as exposing sensitive corporate data without warning or attempted extortion, as seen in their attacks on some of the tech industry’s top companies.

At the same time, regulators and government officials are turning to more and more public responses related to cybersecurity, tightening their grip on corporate reputations through new rules and public scrutiny. With more stringent regulations and increased public reporting, organizations are being held accountable for how they manage and protect sensitive information. Meanwhile, a more cyber-savvy and skeptical public is quick to notice, and react to, any missteps.

Reputation and Technical Cyber Risk: A New Partnership

As the link between reputation and cyber risk grows stronger, IT and Communications teams can no longer afford to operate in silos. Their collaboration should go far beyond crafting post-incident press releases. Here’s how these two critical teams can—and should—work together:

  1. Translate Complexity into Clarity:
    Technical teams understand the risks. Communications teams know how to craft messages that resonate. Together, they can ensure clear, concise explanation of core policies, risks, and responses both internally and externally.
  2. Build a Culture of Security:
    It’s not just about what you say, but how you make it stick. Developing a thoughtful strategy for culture change ensures that security messages are truly internalized throughout the organization.
  3. Plan for the Unexpected:
    Effective scenario planning for data security and privacy risks requires tight coordination. Legal, technical, and Communications teams must work hand-in-hand to prepare for—and respond to—potential crises.

The Benefits of Collaboration

When IT and Communications join forces, the results are tangible:

  • Stronger organizational alignment and buy-in
  • Increased compliance with policies and regulations
  • Faster, more effective crisis response

The specifics of this collaboration will vary but the playbook begins with early alignment on goals, KPIs, desired outcomes and a plan for communicating information to the appropriate stakeholders. Starting before a crisis hits ensures everyone in the organization is working towards shared outcomes.

The threat landscape is only growing more complex and dangerous. While technical defenses are essential, they’re not enough on their own. Real security comes from building awareness, engagement and trust across every level of your organization.

If cybercriminals are evolving their tactics, organizations must evolve, too—not just in how they defend against attacks, but in how they think about and communicate cyber risk.

Scott Radcliffe width= Scott Radcliffe is FleishmanHillard’s global director of cybersecurity, leading the firm’s Cybersecurity Center of Excellence and advising clients on rising cyber risks. He recently rejoined FH from Apple, where he led cybersecurity communications and previously served as the agency’s senior global data privacy and security expert.

 
Article

AI Is a Business Imperative, But It’s a People Challenge First

June 12, 2025

As AI continues to reshape industries, organizations must take proactive steps to engage their workforce in these emerging technologies or risk falling behind. In this series, we will share insights to help leaders ask the right questions, engage and empower their teams, and position their organizations for long-term success in an AI-driven world.

Driving a People-First Adoption Strategy

Whether you work in IT, finance, healthcare, manufacturing, retail, agriculture or any other space—you can no longer afford to view AI as a future consideration. The time to prioritize AI was yesterday. As we enter the second half of a century-defining decade, the gap between companies that empower their workforce for AI-driven change and those that resist it will only continue to widen.

Yet many face real tension—move too quickly, and risk confusion, backlash or missteps that expose the business to unnecessary risk; move too slowly and fall behind competitors or miss out on transformational opportunities. The right path isn’t at either extreme. It’s a disciplined, step-by-step journey rooted in clear communication and a people-first strategy that helps employees navigate disruption with clarity, support and agency. The more planful your organization is, the more equipped you will be to ride the tidal wave of AI innovation coming your way.

A multidimensional approach requires effective communication, cultural readiness, engaged leaders, a skilled workforce, robust infrastructure, and organization-wide AI alignment.

Embracing the Four Pillars of AI Readiness

Future-focused leaders must think critically about how their people, at every level, are thinking, feeling and acting in response to AI-driven change. True readiness goes beyond systems and strategies and is rooted in your people.

Culture

Cultural readiness is about how employees feel—whether they are curious, confident or concerned about AI’s impact on their work. Organizations should create space for conversations about the future of work, and how roles may change in the age of AI. Communication and training must address hesitations directly and intentionally to build belief, trust and understanding around AI’s potential.

Leadership

Leaders need to model behaviors that build trust, safety and resilience during AI transformation. Visible champions of change will reinforce the connection between AI initiatives and the broader business strategy, and create an environment where employees feel supported, empowered and motivated to engage with new technologies.

Knowledge

Bridging knowledge gaps calls for a focus on both skillsets and mindsets. Organizations must explain why AI matters, how it impacts roles and how employees can use it to thrive.

Infrastructure

While infrastructure decisions may reside within IT, communications play a critical role in translating what system changes mean for employees. Communicators are essential to clarify how tools and changes will support safer, better ways of working.

Building this foundation across culture, leadership, knowledge and infrastructure is essential, but understanding your organization’s starting point is just as critical. By asking the right questions, you can identify strengths to build on, vulnerabilities to address and opportunities to align your teams around a clear, honest path forward.

Assessing Your Employees’ AI Readiness

AI transformation is a cross-functional effort, requiring coordination across the executive team, operations, technology — and critically, communications. Communications teams play a pivotal role in assessing organizational readiness, shaping a corresponding narrative around AI adoption and building trust across the organization. Asking yourself these questions can help clarify where your organization stands and where to go next:

Culture

  • Are leaders and employees open to AI adoption?
  • Do employees perceive AI as a threat or an opportunity?
  • Is there a clear understanding of how AI can benefit the company?
  • Does our culture support innovation and experimentation?
  • Do employees feel safe raising concerns, questions or ideas about AI without fear of judgment?

Leadership

  • Is AI a strategic priority for company leaders?
  • Are leaders visibly modeling openness, curiosity and resilience around AI change?
  • Are leaders connecting AI initiatives to the company’s broader mission and purpose in a clear, human-centered way?
  • Are leaders actively listening to employees’ concerns and ideas about AI and incorporating that feedback into decision-making?
  • Are AI investments aligned with business strategy and long-term goals?
  • Do executives understand the risks and opportunities of AI?

Knowledge

  • Are employees clearly informed about how AI systems will impact their work?
  • Do employees have AI-related technical skills?
  • Are there AI literacy programs for nontechnical staff?
  • Is there a talent acquisition strategy for AI expertise?
  • Are employees given clear examples of how AI will make their jobs easier, more impactful or more strategic?

Infrastructure

  • Are AI policies, governance, ethics and security protocols communicated clearly to employees?
  • Are concerns about AI openly acknowledged and addressed in communications?
  • Does our organization have a dedicated function/team or clear points of contact for our AI efforts?
  • Are new AI tools introduced with practical training and ongoing support?

What’s Next?

Start with what you know. If your people seem unsure or skeptical, focus on building trust and curiosity. If your leaders lack engagement, explain why AI matters and provide a framework they can use to model the mindset you want to see. AI readiness is about steady, people-first progress — not perfection. Steps forward could look like any or all of the following:

  • Live AI demo during an upcoming meeting
  • Fireside chat with a leader exploring the why and how of your company’s AI strategy
  • AI checklist outlining ways your organization can use AI to increase efficiency and drive business outcomes

There is no one-size-fits-all path to making an organization AI-ready, but leaders who critically examine their current state and take decisive action will be better positioned to thrive. The success of any AI initiative hinges on how well people understand and adopt it. Clear communication and strategic alignment are essential, and that’s where we can assist — helping you navigate change, engage and align your workforce and ensure a smooth transition.

Elana Sindelar Elana Sindelar works in FleishmanHillard’s Talent + Transformation practice with experience in change management, employee experience and internal communications. She has supported clients through major IT transformations, corporate rebrands and M&A activity. Elana currently focuses on exploring AI’s effect on the future of work, including how the emerging technology is reshaping the employee experience.