Employee Login

Enter your login information to access the intranet

Enter your credentials to access your email

Reset employee password

Article

Insights From Davos: Building Credibility Through Storytelling

January 20, 2026

FleishmanHillard Global President and CEO J.J. Carter participated in ‘License to Lead: Reclaiming the Art of Storytelling’ at the World Economic Forum, a panel discussion exploring how organizations can earn stakeholder trust in an era of constant volatility.

The panel took place at Inkwell Beach and centered on a fundamental question: in this era of uncertainty, who gets to tell the story and who benefits when those stories shift?

Carter joined FleishmanHillard Chief Inclusion and Impact Officer Adrianne C. Smith, Forbes contributor Doug Melville and marketing leader Peter Sloterdyk to discuss this fundamental crisis facing leaders today: the widening gap between what organizations say and what they actually do.

The conversation drew directly from FleishmanHillard’s proprietary License to Lead research, conducted with 5,550 leaders and stakeholders across the globe to understand what actually earns trust in uncertain operating environments. The findings reveal a stark shift in stakeholder expectations and immediate commercial consequences.

While 90% of engaged consumers now expect volatility, they’re no longer willing to accept storytelling disconnected from operational truth. According to the research, stakeholders understand that strategic adaptation is necessary as leaders face pervasive uncertainty. What they say they won’t tolerate is silence or polished narratives that don’t match their lived reality. Those surveyed say that storytelling without operational truth is just noise.

The panel emphasized that authenticity equals accountability with leaders owning their missteps, explaining strategic shifts and demonstrating that they grasp the impact of their decisions on stakeholders before asking for buy-in. Leaders who fail to bring stakeholders along lose credibility faster than any communications misstep.

J.J. Carter and Peter Sloterdyk at Inkwell Beach

The research also surfaced a hopeful finding: people are willing to pivot and evolve if they believe in leadership. The challenge is earning and maintaining that license to lead every single day through consistent, authentic communication rooted in truth.

FleishmanHillard has developed a comprehensive playbook based on these global responses to help leaders navigate this new reality. Organizations looking to close the gap between narrative and operations can access the full License to Lead report below:

Click above to download ‘License To Lead’

Article

From Survival Mode to License to Lead: A Corporate Affairs Playbook for an Uncertain Era

January 13, 2026
License To Lead Report

New calendar years often come with a fresh perspective and a commitment to a fresh start. And though there’s been no shortage of reflection on the current era of unprecedented and pervasive uncertainty, many organizations are still struggling to shift from reactivity to recapturing strategic agency and advantage.  

The compounded experience of widespread corporate shifts on social and political stances, sustainability and product development and the pervasive fear of what AI might mean for work, security and safety have played into a new paradigm of what it takes to build confidence in a company’s leadership. 

It’s past time that every executive leadership team and corporate affairs organization develop a durable playbook for success under these conditions. Our experience counseling C-Suites and communications teams from across global industries and markets have shown us that the central challenge facing organizations is often not determining the right strategy. It is securing the permission to execute when bold or evolving strategies test the limits of stakeholder confidence. That’s what we call having License to Lead.   

Organizations and executives with a License to Lead do not avoid volatility or always manage to walk a straight line from strategy to execution. Instead, they move and adapt with less friction. Why? They start from a position of strength and confidence with their stakeholders. They can pivot earlier and with less reputation clean up, enabling them to recover faster and sustain legitimacy. All while their competitors stall under resistance and skepticism.  

A new survey from our Global Executive Advisory and True Global Intelligence identifies what it takes to earn the License to Lead and where executive teams are falling short. The comprehensive global study includes and compares the opinions of 1,550 business and political leaders and 4,000 engaged consumers—a new, modern definition that identifies proactive individuals who have recently taken multiple tangible actions tied to a company’s values and reputation. Together, the findings paint a clear picture of shifting corporate expectations and reputation. Jump Straight To The Full Report

1. Data from engaged consumers and policymakers show they aren’t blind to the challenging dynamics that business leaders face, leading to a new belief that a top leadership skill is the ability to adapt quickly to change. 

  • 84% of engaged consumers and 82% of policy stakeholders agree the current business environment is more unpredictable and disruptive than it was three years ago. 
  • 51% of engaged consumers believe the ability to adapt quickly to change will matter most for business leaders to succeed over the next decade.   

2. While engaged consumers understand changing circumstances must be met with strategic shifts, there are clear expectations of what must be true to have permission to pivot without losing stakeholders along the way.

Compared to a few years ago, around half of engaged consumers report higher expectations of companies to:

  • Act with their customers in mind (52%)
  • Do the right thing (50%)
  • Act with a balanced stakeholder approach (47%)

Over 90% of engaged consumers report the following actions are key to building confidence in a company’s leadership:

  • Communicating their strategy and direction in clear, straightforward terms (93%)
  • Ensuring a consistent message about the company’s goals (93%)
  • Being transparent about the reasons behind difficult decisions (93%)
  • Genuinely engaging with and listening to their stakeholders (94%)

The top three factors to building long-term loyalty include:

  • Product the company offers (42%)
  • Company’s mission and purpose (38%)
  • How the company treats employees and stakeholders (38%)  

The benefits of meeting these expectations are striking: 92% say a company with a strong, positive reputation has more permission to undertake a major business transformation and 85% of engaged consumers being likely to give a company they respect the benefit of the doubt if there is a crisis or mistake. 

3. However, there’s a major gap between how leaders think they’re doing, and how stakeholders grade them – and that gap reveals a major erosion of confidence in business.    

  • Business and policy stakeholders express great confidence in large companies despite today’s volatility. 49% of executives and 44% of policy stakeholders are very optimistic in corporate leaders’ ability to address challenges; 51% and 41% respectively have a lot of confidence that business leaders will act in the best interest of society, and 44% and 36% believe large companies are very prepared to lead effectively during future disruption.   
  • However, engaged consumers don’t score business nearly as high. Just 20% of global engaged consumers are very optimistic about large companies’ ability to address major challenges. Only 19% have a lot of confidence that corporate leaders will act in the best interests of society, and only 15% believe companies are very prepared to navigate uncertainty and disruption.    

4. The consequences of failing to bring stakeholders along as a company drives the strategy forward go well beyond an abstract benchmark on reputation. 

  • Corporate credibility has become highly fragile: 98% of engaged consumers say they are paying attention to corporate follow-through, and nearly half (48%) say that inconsistent or conflicting messages from company leadership greatly decrease their confidence.   
  • That loss of confidence comes with a loss of spending. In the past 12 months, engaged consumers reported that after a company’s actions caused them to lose confidence they stopped buying or significantly reduced spending (58%), switched to a competitor’s products or services (50%), or privately advised friends or family against the company (40%).  

5. Engaged consumers are over grand purpose and vision statements. Today’s priorities are about rebuilding the table stakes of corporate behavior, communication and stakeholder respect – and to earn License to Lead, executives must take a hard look at whether they’re measuring up.  

  • When asked what gives a company the “right to lead” during periods of change, engaged consumers ranked demonstrated ethical behavior (24%) and clear and consistent communication (21%) the highest. When it comes to confidence-building behaviors from leaders, an overwhelming 76% of global engaged consumers say displaying integrity is very important and 74% say the same of accountability. These values rank higher than even raw competence (66%). 
  • A major perception gap must be addressed by business leaders about the success of their current efforts. While executives say they often see business leaders displaying integrity and honesty (44%) and accountability (40%), engaged consumers rank their performance much lower at 23% and 22%, respectively.   

A New Executive Playbook to Create the License to Lead 

What emerges from the data validates that a new playbook for leadership is both urgently needed and also completely within a company’s control – built through a consultative partnership between the C-Suite and corporate communications, corporate affairs, public affairs and other critical functions. In other words, while so much of the world feels out of a company’s control, successfully winning and retaining license to lead isn’t. 

Becoming a high performing, aligned organization that can move quickly to fast-track opportunities and adapt without the drag of residual “reputation pollution” isn’t accidental. It is the result of cultivated conditions.  

  • Simplification as an Antidote to Complexity: High-performing leaders focus relentlessly on answering three fundamental questions: Where are we going? Why now? What principles guide us? If your stakeholders can’t repeat the direction back to you, you haven’t simplified enough. 
  • Ruthless Leadership Alignment: Misalignment erodes permission faster than bad news. In organizations with a License to Lead, alignment is a discipline, not a communications exercise. Visible alignment signals strategic confidence and pivots feel coordinated rather than chaotic. 
  • Campaign the Strategy: Too many companies assume everyone is following the breadcrumbs. Recently, one of our clients had an analyst who attended the company’s Investor Day where the strategy was launched act surprised when he heard about it again six months later. The strategy for the future should anchor every communication to drive to a consistent audience takeaway.  
  • Owning the “Why”: Our data proves that stakeholders are savvy to the big picture – and they don’t want to feel gaslit by leaders about decision reasons or implications. Radical honesty about rationale and tradeoffs behind strategic shifts protects credibility and keeps leaders in control of the narrative. 
  • Stakeholder Relevance Without Shortcuts: Permission is earned through engagement, not declaration. Broad, aspirational purpose statements are insufficient during real change. Stakeholders grant permission when can see their concerns reflected in how decisions were made and how the human impacts are handled.  

When these conditions are met, reputation becomes an enabling force. Stakeholders grant leaders the permission to change course, absorb uncertainty, and continue moving forward even when the path is not yet fully visible. That permission is what allows ambition and adaption without breaking execution. 

Corporate Affairs as Leadership’s Operating System 

Meeting these conditions cannot be improvised. It requires a system. To build License to Lead, corporate affairs must operate as an integrated leadership infrastructure—one that continuously converts complexity into clarity and builds reputational capital through stakeholder buy-in to sustain legitimacy as leaders make decision that move the strategy forward.  

This shift is subtle but profound. Leaders increasingly rely on corporate affairs to answer fundamental questions: 

  • What do stakeholders have confidence in us to do?  
  • What do they need to understand to stick with us through change?  
  • Where will friction emerge and how can we smooth it? 
  • How much latitude do we have to move—and where are the limits? 

High-performing corporate affairs functions integrate three capabilities—Insight, Influence, and Adaptability—not as separate activities, but as a continuous operating loop. We look forward to expanding on those throughout 2026.  

The Leadership Test Ahead 

What’s clear from the data and trends is that in 2026, disruption is expected. It will no longer be an excuse for inertia, poor performance and self-inflicted stalls. In fact, adapting fast enough to succeed despite chaotic conditions is the new benchmark for leadership. Taken together, these implications redefine what it means to lead through uncertainty to get to the competitive advantage. Leadership is no longer about minimizing change. It is about managing it without losing legitimacy. 

Strategy will evolve. Assumptions will break. External realities will continue to intrude. The leaders who succeed will be those who recognize that permission is as critical as direction—and who build the reputational and organizational capacity to sustain it over time. 

That is the essence of a License to Lead. 

    Get the Full Report

    Article

    License To Lead: A Corporate Leadership Global Study

    January 7, 2026

    In an era of unprecedented disruption, executives face a paradox: while they understand the strategic direction their organizations need to pursue, they often lack the stakeholder capital required to execute bold change. This is the central insight of a new global study on corporate leadership, and it helps explain why so many well-conceived strategies stall before gaining traction.

    The research identifies what top-performing companies are doing differently. They possess what we call a License to Lead, the stakeholder confidence that allows them to innovate and adapt without losing legitimacy or reputation.

    Disruption is no longer an excuse for poor performance. It is simply the operating environment. The organizations that will thrive are those that treat corporate affairs not as a discrete function, but as an integrated leadership operating system—one that continuously converts complexity into clarity and builds the reputational capital needed to sustain confidence through inevitable change.

    Download the full License to Lead report below to explore the data, insights, and leadership behaviors that enable organizations to adapt, move decisively and sustain stakeholder confidence in uncertain times. You can see some of the top findings here.

      Get the Full Report
      Article

      Get the Report: Corporate Affairs Trends for 2026

      December 10, 2025

      Expectations from executives and stakeholders continue to rise. Geopolitical and societal uncertainty is intensifying. The demand to show clear business impact is higher than ever. This is the constant pressure cooker corporate affairs leaders operate in. Their role is more central to enterprise value but with that comes exposure to risk, scrutiny and rapid change.

      Our latest forecast surfaces the trends that matter most for senior communications professionals. Grounded in data, real-world observation and conversations with clients across sectors, it cuts through the noise to focus on what is actually shifting in the operating environment and what that means for your team, your agenda and your influence inside the business. It also looks back on 2025 predictions to draw out lessons that can guide leaders in the year ahead.

      Click Below to Download the Report and dive deeper on the FleishmanHillard UK site.

      The License To Lead Study: A New Corporate Playbook for 2026

       Click Below for More Reports From the UK Team:

      Article

      Executive Impact: Turning Transitions into an Enterprise Advantage

      By Elizabeth Cook, Chris Thornton and Michelle Mahony

      The spotlight on executives has never been brighter. In 2025, CEO turnover is hitting record highs and CFO departures at Fortune 500 companies are up 33% year over year. CEO tenure continues to shrink —to just 6.8 years.  

      Against a backdrop of AI disruption, geopolitical and supply chain pressure, employee and stakeholder challenges and investor scrutiny, leaders are expected to deliver impact fast. Nearly half of executive transitions are judged as failures or disappointments within two years. Yet despite these pressures, most organizations still treat executive transitions as a sequence of announcements and introductions — and the shallowness of this approach is more evident than ever.  

      Transitions aren’t PR moments. They’re enterprise moments. The difference shows up in results. Handled well, a transition can unlock energy, clarify priorities, and accelerate operating performance. Handled poorly, it drains trust, distracts teams, and invites scrutiny. The difference in outcomes isn’t driven by the number of interviews or town halls conducted or the addition of a few more executive LinkedIn posts. It’s dependent on a complete re-think of the support that executives receive in transition and a laser focus on how leadership skills, change management principles and communications can come together to drive success.   

      As we head into 2026 expecting the pressure on new leaders to only grow, the Global Executive Advisory teams for FleishmanHillard and Daggerwing Group have formalized an integrated approach to transition that moves from executive visibility to Executive Impact. Executive Impact is a new way to manage leadership transitions as critical, ongoing business processes that shape reputation and future performance. Success isn’t measured by optics but by outcomes: how quickly a leader earns trust, sets strategic direction, and delivers results.  

      Because real impact depends on more than narrative, Executive Impact includes the underlying mechanics that determine performance: clarifying how the leader will shape structure, decision rights, operating rhythms, and processes so the organization can deliver measurable business results at speed. 

      Our Five As for Executive Impact transition framework offers a practical path for new executives to follow from the moment they know they’ll be taking the seat—but it also can be entered at any point by an executive who begins to feel that their organization isn’t fit for the challenges ahead. We help executives create and operationalize momentum—making it easier for their team to believe, act, and deliver together: 

      • Announce with intent: Focus executive appointment communications on establishing credibility and setting expectations, align communications across audiences and regulations, and prepare leadership teams and champions to carry consistent messages. 
      • Align through understanding: Balance listening with diagnosis and the setting of leadership expectations, and operationalize early shifts in roles, rhythms, and decision forums. 
      • Activate the agenda: Articulate a visible purpose and strategy, define early choices and symbolic moves, and connect communications to execution. 
      • Accelerate the system: Equip the leadership team to deliver at pace, close gaps, manage moves decisively, and embed cadences that create urgency and ownership. 
      • Amplify what works: Codify new norms, keep stakeholders updated, reconnect to purpose, and prepare for the next inflection point. 

      This system targets real business outcomes: Faster trust and alignment across executive and employee teams and boards of directors, quicker strategy adoption and execution, and reduced risk of derailment in the first 180 days. 

      Our experience includes Fortune 100 leadership transition consulting and coaching; turnaround, transformation, integration and culture programs; CEO and C-suite positioning and visibility programs; employee, investor and stakeholder engagement; and counseling companies across issues, crisis, and C-suites in duress. 

      Leaders don’t get a second chance to make a first impression. Every transition carries risk; the right design turns that risk into resilience. Executive Impact helps leaders set a credible course, accelerate execution, and sustain momentum beyond the early window. If you’re anticipating a change — or need to course-correct — FleishmanHillard and Daggerwing Group can partner with you to make this transition your advantage. 

      Executive Impact
      From Left to Right: Elizabeth Cook, Chris Thornton and Michelle Mahony

      Elizabeth Cook is part of the FleishmanHillard U.S. corporate affairs leadership team and directs regional executive positioning offerings.

      Chris Thornton is Senior Principal at Daggerwing Group and works with leaders to build the mindsets, skills, and confidence needed to lead transformation and embed change across complex organizations.

      Michelle Mahony is the President of Daggerwing Group and works to bring together the science and art of transformation to life for clients.

      Article

      Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution: AI’s Role in Crisis, Issues and Risk Management

      October 14, 2025
      By Matt Rose and Alexander Lyall

      Everyone’s talking about the promise of artificial intelligence. For crisis, issues and risk managers, that promise isn’t theoretical anymore. It’s already changing the game. The speed, scale and complexity of today’s challenges demand more than human effort alone. We need tools that sharpen judgment, spot risks sooner, simulate outcomes and move faster than we ever could on our own.

      At FleishmanHillard, we call this Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution. It’s the balance of seasoned, human counsel with the foresight, scale and speed of AI. When used well, AI doesn’t replace human judgment, it strengthens it. AI compresses timelines, expands context, flags risks earlier and gives leaders the clarity they need under pressure.

      Here’s how we’re putting this advantage into practice at FleishmanHillard, using trusted frameworks and strong data governance to help clients address crises, issues and risk with confidence.

      AI for Early Warning

      AI is becoming an essential early warning system. It examines global news, regulatory updates, and social activity to detect emerging topics and weak signals before they escalate. By analyzing conversations across markets, languages, and, it connects jurisdictions patterns that siloed teams might miss, with speed and breadth that today’s lean human teams cannot match.

      It can also track how issues are likely to evolve and flag pressure points like upcoming regulations, activist campaigns, or viral moments. In addition, it can be pointed to anticipate when separate concerns may converge, adding complexity to timing, messaging, audience response and stakeholder engagement. This kind of foresight helps leaders act early, communicate clearly and stay ahead before critical moments hit.

      AI for Stakeholder Simulation

      Spotting a potential issue is one thing. Understanding how different audiences might respond is the next. Employees may question values. Regulators may focus on compliance. Investors may worry about financial impact. Customers may be concerned about reliability.

      AI helps make this analysis possible through FleishmanHillard’s SAGE Synthetic Audiences. These simulations, built on polling data, demographics, and behavioral insights, let teams pressure-test messaging in real time.

      AI can also model how a story might spread. Coverage could draw regulatory attention, spark activism, or open the door for competitors. With this foresight, teams can weigh options early, decide how to respond, and plan outreach in the right order.

      AI for Story Forecasting

      Reporters rarely work in isolation. Their previous stories, tone, and interview style often foreshadow how a new piece might unfold. AI can analyze this public data to forecast likely narratives, giving teams time to scenario-plan and prepare fact-based responses.

      In one recent case, the FleishmanHillard team leveraged AI to generate a full-length draft of a potential investigative article based on a reporter’s in-depth inquiry, their past work, and facts they were likely to uncover. The projection closely matched the final story, serving as a clear model for the client and FH counselors to work against and affording weeks to prepare. Together, they aligned messaging, cleared responses and rehearsed scenarios. When the article ran, the team responded with focus and confidence, avoiding both unwanted attention and business disruption.

      Click Above for More From the FleishmanHillard Crisis Team

      AI for Crisis Content Management

      Crisis response is rarely just one statement. It quickly becomes a growing stack of analytics and materials: standby statements, employee letters, investor scripts, customer updates, government briefings, media talking points, FAQs and social posts. Managing it all can become chaotic, especially with lengthy approval chains.

      AI tools like FH Crisis Navigator help bring order. Acting as a virtual program manager, it adapts approved language for different audiences with speed and consistency. Using this tool, a crisis counselor can generate drafts, maintain version control, and keep updates aligned across every document. This reduces drift, speeds up approvals, embeds expert counsel, and keeps teams focused. So, when leadership needs to respond – whether to investors, regulators, customers, or the public – everything is already in place and ready for review.

      AI for Scenario-Based Training

      Preparation has always been essential to crisis readiness. But traditional tabletop exercises often fall short of real-world complexity. AI-powered platforms like the FleishmanHillard Crisis Simulation Lab raise the bar. Run by experienced facilitators, these simulations evolve in real time based on participant decisions. They introduce realistic challenges like media calls, stakeholder emails and viral posts, all tailored to the organization’s sector and geography.

      Simulations can launch in hours instead of weeks, making them useful for both training and real-time strategy support. Structured feedback focuses on fact management, stakeholder engagement, and adaptability – building the muscle memory teams need when reputations are on the line.

      AI for Campaign Risk Screening

      Crises don’t always come from the outside. Sometimes a product launch, influencer partnership, or purpose-driven campaign can spark backlash, trigger scrutiny, or misfire in a volatile moment.

      FH Risk Radar helps teams assess these risks before campaigns go live. It reviews concepts against regulatory guidance, cultural signals, public sentiment, and platform-specific challenges. The system scores ideas across dimensions like reputational exposure, influencer fit, message durability, and cultural sensitivity. Instead of a simple go-or-no-go call, teams get a full risk profile and clear mitigation strategies. This shifts review from a late-stage checkpoint to a strategic advantage.

      From Promise to Practice

      For communicators, risk leaders, and executives, AI is no longer a future promise. It’s a working tool, a strategic coach, and a force multiplier available to improve outcomes now. It surfaces early warning signs, simulates reactions, forecasts narratives, manages complex content, powers training, and screens campaigns. It delivers sharper, faster options for decision makers when every move counts.

      AI’s role in crisis and risk management will only grow more sophisticated. But the message today is simple: the technology is here and can be applied to create immediate value. The leaders who use it will be better prepared to protect reputation in high-stakes moments.

      At FleishmanHillard, we’re applying these tools every day to help clients anticipate challenges, navigate uncertainty, and emerge stronger. At the heart of it is Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution – the combination of trusted human counsel and the structured speed of AI. Together, they help organizations make better decisions, faster.

      Crisis Team width=

      Matt Rose (top) – Americas Lead for Crisis, Issues & Risk Management: Matt is an SVP & Senior Partner in New York with more than 30 years’ experience in advising organizations on crisis and issues management, risk mitigation, and reputation recovery. He has guided companies through reputational crises, labor issues, regulatory challenges, ESG controversies, and high-profile litigation.
      Alex Lyall – Lead, Risk Management, AI & Innovation: Alex is an SVP & Partner in New York with more than 15 years of experience in crisis communications, issues management, preparedness, and risk management, working across industries. As part of the leadership team, Alex will help define best practices, shape go-to-market strategies, and scales solutions, with a focus on AI integration and talent development.
       

      FH Guidelines for AI in Crisis, Issues, and Risk Management Applications

      At FleishmanHillard, we apply artificial intelligence with purpose, not hype. In crisis, issues, and risk management, that means combining human expertise and experience with proven frameworks, proprietary technology, necessary confidentiality, and responsible guardrails to help organizations respond with speed, confidence, and control.
      During a crisis, there is no substitute for seasoned judgment. AI can surface information, suggest language, or model scenarios, but it cannot navigate the nuance of legal implications, stakeholder dynamics, or reputational risk in real time. That takes seasoned counselors who have sat in the room, weighed the tradeoffs, and led under pressure. When the stakes are high, experience is not just helpful, it is essential.
      That is why each FleishmanHillard application of AI in the Crisis, Issues and Risk Management Practice is anchored in three principles:
      • Experienced crisis counselors remain at the center of each use case, ensuring that technology enhances but never replaces human judgment.
      • Our systems are designed in secure, quality-assured environments that safeguard client information and uphold rigorous ethical standards.
      • AI is embedded within tested frameworks and workflows, allowing teams to move faster without sacrificing accuracy, accountability, or trust.
      This disciplined approach ensures AI strengthens decision-making rather than creating new risks. With FleishmanHillard, organizations embrace innovation in crisis, issues, and risk management with confidence, knowing that innovation never comes at the expense of accuracy, ethics, or trust.

       

       
      Article

      Full Speed Ahead: An Executive’s Guide to Change Management for Regulated Reporting 

      October 7, 2025
      By Bob Axelrod

      As the deadline for complying with the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) approaches, company leaders will soon need to evolve their reporting process. The CSRD and its underlying disclosure standards, the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), usher in a new era of reporting, requiring companies operating in the EU to provide detailed, standardized responsible business and sustainability disclosures that are audit-grade.  

      The temptation to pause and await further clarifications — such as outcomes from the “Omnibus Simplification Package” — may seem prudent, but that’s a risky calculation. The direction of travel is clear, and operational readiness is a multiyear endeavor that cannot wait. 

      Change Management: The Deciding Factor 

      CSRD compliance is far more than a reporting exercise. It requires a transformation in how your company operates, collaborates and delivers information — with audit-ready precision and cross-functional accountability.  

      If your company has experience with voluntary responsible business reporting, you’re somewhat ahead of the curve. But regulated, externally assured reporting is a different game altogether, comparable to the shifts required when financial reporting became regulated. The scale of change necessitates active executive sponsorship, clear ownership and a culture that embraces transparency and due diligence. 

      Acting Now Is Essential 

      Waiting for absolute certainty from regulatory bodies creates a dangerous illusion. The core requirements of the CSRD are already defined.  

      Delaying action can leave your organization scrambling to catch up, leading to higher implementation costs, operational disruptions and potentially subpar reporting that may expose your organization to fines and reputational risks. Early movers can pilot new processes, identify data gaps and course-correct before mandatory disclosures are enforced, therefore gaining an advantage in data quality, audit readiness and stakeholder credibility. 

      Key Steps for Success 

      1. Expand Cross-Functional Collaboration: Sustainability, finance, legal, risk, HR, IT, audit, procurement and other key functions must all be fluent in responsible business principles and actively engaged in reporting processes. 

      2. Upskill and Train: Teams require targeted training in data governance, due diligence and audit-level documentation — going beyond simple awareness. 

      3. Resource for Rigor: Subject matter experts need greater support, including additional staff, time and specialized expertise. Empowering them is critical for accurate, timely and complete disclosures. 

      4. Embed Accountability: Define clear roles, set ownership and align performance incentives. Make CSRD compliance a shared objective, visibly sponsored by both the C-suite and the board of directors. 

      5. Invest in Technology: Manual data collection is no longer viable. Integrated systems for data management and workflow are non-negotiable to meet the demands of CSRD. 

      Executive Leadership: Setting the Pace 

      Leaders must model the mindset shift that CSRD requires. Treat compliance as a transformation, not a checkbox exercise. Champion resource allocation and insist on regular progress updates.  

      Building a Resilient, Future-Ready Organization 

      CSRD compliance is ultimately a change management effort — one that will be won or lost at the executive level. By setting new expectations, providing the necessary resources and embedding accountability, you can transform compliance from a regulatory burden into a strategic advantage.  

      The upcoming Omnibus Simplification Package may clarify technical nuances, but the urgency to act is now. Operational readiness takes time, and the cost of playing catch-up is high. Is your organization equipped to meet not just the letter of mandatory reporting, but to thrive in this new era of transparency and due diligence? 

      FleishmanHillard is here to help your organization navigate this evolving landscape. Connect with us today to propel you forward, no matter where you are on the winding road to CSRD readiness.  

      Bob Axelrod width= Bob Axelrod is a member of FleishmanHillard’s global Responsible Business and Impact leadership team. He has 30+ years’ experience advising corporations on Responsible Business strategy and reporting and is spearheading a multi-agency effort to help clients effectively comply with mandatory reporting requirements, including the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

       
      Article

      Tariffs, Trust and Transparency: How to Communicate Price Increases Without Losing Stakeholder Confidence

      August 13, 2025
      By Donna Fontana, Matt Rose and Kristie Sigler

      As of August 2025, expanded US tariffs are reshaping pricing across industries, from seafood and electronics to Swiss watches and appliances. While many companies have avoided public discussion of tariff-driven price increases, this “run silent” strategy may be unsustainable as cumulative price pressures intensify and customer sensitivity peaks.

      For business leaders and their communications teams, the question is no longer whether to communicate price increases but how to do so without damaging trust, inviting backlash or creating political risk.

      Why Silence May Not Be Sustainable

      Most organizations still approach price communication as if customers, whether in B2B or consumer markets, evaluate each increase in isolation. The reality is shifting. With tariffs now affecting multiple categories at once, customers will face higher costs from many directions simultaneously. Even modest, justified increases risk being seen as price gouging when viewed through the lens of cumulative burden.

      For consumer brands, the risks are visible and often viral. For B2B companies, the stakes are just as high. Cost pressures are identical but brand recognition is often weaker and communication channels fewer.

      There is also a political dimension. In sensitive categories, tariff-related price communications must consider alignment, or perceived misalignment, with the Administration’s economic narrative. Messaging that appears to contradict official positions on trade, inflation or consumer costs can draw not just customer pushback but also political scrutiny.

      The Emotional Reality

      Price increases may be driven by economics, but they are received emotionally. Customers, whether households or procurement teams, feel the squeeze of multiple increases across different products and services. That can produce frustration far out of proportion to any one company’s actions.

      This is where communication becomes as much about empathy as explanation. Overcommunication carries its own risks but failing to address perceptions leaves a vacuum that competitors, critics or policymakers may fill. Monitoring sentiment, anticipating questions and responding in plain language should be treated as operational priorities.

      Strategic Principles for Tariff-Era Price Communication

      Not every company will face the same pricing challenges but many will need to refresh their approach. The following principles offer a framework for explaining price increases in a way that preserves relationships and reduces reputational risk.

      1. Lead with Transparency, Not Excuses
      Replace generic “rising costs” statements with specific context:

      “Recent changes in trade policy have significantly increased our sourcing costs. Rather than compromise quality, we have made a modest price adjustment while continuing to invest in the partnerships and processes that protect the quality customers expect.”

      2. Make It Personal, Not Political
      Customers want empathy, not a policy seminar:

      “We know prices are rising everywhere, and we are not immune. We are committed to fairness, transparency, and quality – even as global input costs change.”

      3. Show Your Mitigation Efforts
      Make it clear that you have considered the interests of all stakeholders, including policymakers, and that raising prices was the last resort:

      “We have streamlined logistics and reduced packaging waste to shield customers from rising costs. We are also absorbing a portion of the increase ourselves to minimize the impact. But with input costs climbing sharply, a modest adjustment has become unavoidable.”

      4. Ensure Cross-Channel Consistency
      Your investor communications will be seen by customers and customer communications will be seen by policymakers. Develop unified messaging for all stakeholder groups, equip teams with consistent language and monitor every touchpoint.

      5. Reinforce Brand Values
      Tie the increase to commitments to quality, sustainability or integrity. A beauty brand citing tariffs also emphasized its continued investment in cruelty-free, high-quality products. The subtext: we are not cutting corners.

      6. Prepare for Emotional Responses Across Markets
      Monitor sentiment in real time, assess perception gaps between audiences and benchmark against peers. Be mindful of global market reactions and ensure you have the channels in place for agile, coordinated communication across regions. Respond quickly with empathy, clarity and cultural awareness when resistance rises in any market.

      7. Consider Industry Coordination
      Trade associations can sometimes lower political and consumer risk by explaining category-wide economics, though each brand must still deliver its own aligned message.

      The Bottom Line: From Pass-Through to Reputational Risk

      Pass-through pricing has evolved from a supply chain term to a source of reputational risk. While there is no universal blueprint, companies that plan now will have more control over the narrative later.

      Tariffs may be beyond corporate control. But the story you tell about your pricing decisions, and the value your products deliver, is entirely yours to shape. Trust is not lost in a single price increase; it is lost when companies fail to explain why. In an environment where nearly everything costs more, transparent reasoning may be the most valuable thing you share for free.

      Our Executive Advisory. Your C-level advantage.

      Article

      What America’s AI Action Plan Means for Leaders Now

      July 24, 2025
      By Josh McConnell

      Don’t think of this as just a policy reset. It’s a reputational crossroads. In a deregulatory moment, the real challenge isn’t compliance. It’s communication plain and simple: how to explain, defend and lead through what comes next.

      The U.S. government has issued its clearest signal yet that it intends to lead the world in AI through acceleration over regulation.

      America’s AI Action Plan, unveiled this month, reframes U.S. tech policy around three pillars: innovation, infrastructure, and international competitiveness. It rolls back many of the Biden-era safety and fairness frameworks, instead emphasizing open-source development, rapid deployment and private-sector partnership. For CCOs and CMOs, this isn’t just a policy update. It’s a pressure shift. With fewer federal rules in place, the burden of defining and defending responsible AI now falls squarely on companies themselves. That means your narrative, transparency and readiness matter more than ever.

      How To Respond Ahead of the Spotlight

      1. From frameworks to frontline comms, you can feel scrutiny shifting
      With Biden-era guardrails rolled back, there’s more ambiguity and reputational risk. Review your systems, filtering practices and content neutrality positions ASAP. Comms teams need clarity and defensibility, especially where DEI, safety filters and model transparency intersect.

      2. Prepare your public narrative before the news cycle tests it
      Build messaging that goes beyond launches and investor decks. Emphasize ethical foresight, safety, training transparency and societal value in your comms. Assume watchdog groups, press and policymakers are already watching and look at your narrative through their eyes and position accordingly. Even consider a virtual audience simulation that will pressure test messaging for different mindsets. It’s ultimate defense as offense.

      3. Make your company part of the national story
      This plan isn’t just tech policy. It’s economic and diplomatic strategy. Companies that align their messaging with national priorities like innovation, infrastructure and workforce development will carry more weight with policymakers, partners and procurement leaders.

      And in today’s generative search environment, those narratives aren’t just for press releases. They’re a crucial part of brand discovery. Organizations are can shape how they are surfaced, summarized and evaluated in search. If your brand isn’t telling a clear story, it’s likely that AI will try to do it for you or ignore you completely.

      4. Engage now, not later
      If your teams haven’t opened dialogue with NIST, OSTP or other agency stakeholders, now is the time to start. Participation in federal consultations and comment periods will shape procurement standards and signal leadership. You don’t want silence to be interpreted as an absence of a point of view.

      5. Signal leadership through your talent
      AI-readiness isn’t just about model performance. This is all about workforce planning. Use this moment to communicate investments in retraining, apprenticeships and education. This is reputational insulation and long-term eligibility for federal partnerships.

      6. Strengthen your risk and compliance narrative
      This plan includes stricter export controls, national security filters and new expectations for “secure by design” standards. Global comms must now reflect both regulatory divergence (EU, China) and internal alignment across legal, engineering and policy.

      7. Know where your infra story fits
      For companies in data centers, chips or energy, this is also an opportunity moment. Comms teams should coordinate early with government affairs, bid teams and legal to ensure eligibility positioning aligns with public messaging.

      8. Plan for federal-state friction
      As state-level bias audits, content governance and privacy laws expand, tensions with federal policy will grow. Your public narrative and internal compliance playbook must account for that dual reality.

      So what comes next?

      The companies that lead through this moment won’t be those that publish the longest policies. They’ll be the ones who explain their role with the most clarity, credibility and consistency both internally and externally.

      The policy shift is clear: the U.S. is betting on speed, scale and innovation. But for communications leaders, the implications run deeper.

      The questions coming next about explainability, bias, security and global alignment won’t be answered by engineers alone. They’ll require strong narratives, clear values and messages that hold up under scrutiny. Communications team won’t follow this story. They’ll help define it.

      Josh McConnell  Josh McConnell is a VP of Technology based in New York where he helps companies navigate complex narratives at the intersection of innovation, reputation and culture. He brings over 15 years of experience across journalism and corporate comms, with leadership roles at Uber and Xero. As a journalist, he regularly interviewed tech leaders including Tim Cook, Satya Nadella and Jack Dorsey.

       
      Article

      Protecting Relationships During a Cyber Crisis

      June 3, 2025
      By Cody Want

      When a cyber incident hits, IT and legal are often the first to get the call—for good reason. IT teams must act swiftly to contain, remediate and investigate the breach, while legal teams must ensure compliance with regulatory and contractual obligations and manage legal exposure.

      But a strictly technical or legal lens can narrow your field of vision. Without broader perspective, you risk overlooking the long-term impact on trust and reputation. In the critical early hours of a response, you need someone in the room to ask: “Now that we know what we’re required to do—what else should we do?”

      How you manage the technical and procedural aspects of a cyber incident is essential—it’s foundational to restoring operational confidence. But reputation isn’t built on competence alone; it’s a true test of values. In a crisis, stakeholders are paying attention not only to what you do, but how you engage—and whether your actions reflect the commitments you’ve made in steadier times. The impressions formed in these moments of uncertainty can endure far beyond the incident itself.

      Think of cyber incident response as a three-legged stool: IT, legal and communications. Without that third leg, your response may be technically compliant—but misaligned and disconnected from the broader reality of stakeholder expectations. That imbalance can compound risk.

      Communicating through a cyber crisis is rarely straightforward. There’s significant pressure to provide clarity on the situation, but forensic investigations take time, threat actors cover their tracks and facts change. The difficulty of navigating these considerations—and the potential impact of a misstep—doesn’t mean you should downplay the need to communicate. It means it’s more important than ever to fill that space, especially when the demand for communications is highest.

      That complexity isn’t a reason to step back from communication—it’s a signal to step in more thoughtfully. In moments of high uncertainty, demand for transparency rises.

      The right communications strategy acknowledges these challenges while ensuring that trust and relationships aren’t casualties of the crisis. Here are three principles to guide your approach:

      • Be stakeholder-centric: Start with a clear understanding of who your stakeholders are and what they need to hear from you. Reputation is shaped in the details of how you communicate—how you time employee updates, brief partners and how you equip and support customer-facing teams.
      • Avoid media tunnel vision: The headlines matter, but they’re not the whole story. In most incidents, your long-term reputation is shaped more by internal and stakeholder communications than by a single news cycle. Media relations is just one part—often a small part—of a much broader response.
      • Think of future conversations: Imagine explaining your decisions months from now to a key stakeholder. They might not be fully satisfied, but will they understand and respect how you handled the situation given the constraints you were facing?

      When and How to Communicate

      Cyber incidents create uncertainty. If you don’t provide information to your stakeholders, others will do it for you—customers on social media, employees in break rooms, journalists on deadline.

      More On Planning For Uncertainty: Meet the Global Executive Advisory

      This doesn’t mean sharing everything, with everyone, all at once. It means thoughtfully assessing what your stakeholders likely know or assume, what you know and can responsibly say, and how best to bridge the gap. There’s no perfect answer. Often, it’s a day-by-day judgment call.

      Understanding every stakeholder’s perspective and expectations in this level of detail takes work—but it’s work that always pays off. In a crisis, you’ll never regret having spent time preparing your communications strategy.

      Some of the key questions to ask:

      • Clients & Partners: Should high-value relationships get a direct update or a 1:1 call? How are you supporting them through operational disruption?
      • Customers: Are they worried about incompetence—or their data? How are you addressing concerns, inquiries, and frustration?
      • Employees: Do they know what they can and can’t say? Are they prepared to respond to external questions or internal uncertainty?
      • Media & Digital: Should you respond to inquiries, or would that validate speculation? How do you monitor and address unverified rumors before they escalate? What should you do about blogs and anonymous accounts?
      • Board & Investors: How do you keep key stakeholders informed without escalating concern or overpromising outcomes?
      • Regulators & Authorities: Beyond mandated disclosures, what messaging aligns with your broader corporate values?
      • Other Key Audiences: Who else expects to hear from you? Have you considered suppliers, industry associations, or even competitors who might be affected?

      More Than a Response—A Reputation Strategy

      IT and legal are essential to resolving the technical and regulatory dimensions of a cyber incident. But stakeholders don’t measure your performance by minimum requirements—they measure it by how you made them feel. Ask yourself: are you communicating in a way that reassures and retains trust?

      The best responses manage short-term pressures without compromising long-term relationships. Even within the constraints of investigation and legal risk, organizations that integrate communications expertise are better positioned to emerge with credibility intact—and often stronger.

      Cyber incidents may be inevitable. Reputational damage doesn’t have to be. The real question isn’t just whether you responded— it’s whether you’re responding in a way that strengthens trust and credibility in the long run.

      Cody Want Cody Want is FleishmanHillard’s U.S. Cyber Crisis Lead with extensive experience in cyber incident response and preparedness. He has helped clients through a wide range of crisis and issues situations, including undercover media investigations, major restructures, union disputes and many other regulatory and reputational challenges.