Employee Login

Enter your login information to access the intranet

Enter your credentials to access your email

Reset employee password

Article

Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution: AI’s Role in Crisis, Issues and Risk Management

October 14, 2025
By Matt Rose and Alexander Lyall

Everyone’s talking about the promise of artificial intelligence. For crisis, issues and risk managers, that promise isn’t theoretical anymore. It’s already changing the game. The speed, scale and complexity of today’s challenges demand more than human effort alone. We need tools that sharpen judgment, spot risks sooner, simulate outcomes and move faster than we ever could on our own.

At FleishmanHillard, we call this Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution. It’s the balance of seasoned, human counsel with the foresight, scale and speed of AI. When used well, AI doesn’t replace human judgment, it strengthens it. AI compresses timelines, expands context, flags risks earlier and gives leaders the clarity they need under pressure.

Here’s how we’re putting this advantage into practice at FleishmanHillard, using trusted frameworks and strong data governance to help clients address crises, issues and risk with confidence.

AI for Early Warning

AI is becoming an essential early warning system. It examines global news, regulatory updates, and social activity to detect emerging topics and weak signals before they escalate. By analyzing conversations across markets, languages, and, it connects jurisdictions patterns that siloed teams might miss, with speed and breadth that today’s lean human teams cannot match.

It can also track how issues are likely to evolve and flag pressure points like upcoming regulations, activist campaigns, or viral moments. In addition, it can be pointed to anticipate when separate concerns may converge, adding complexity to timing, messaging, audience response and stakeholder engagement. This kind of foresight helps leaders act early, communicate clearly and stay ahead before critical moments hit.

AI for Stakeholder Simulation

Spotting a potential issue is one thing. Understanding how different audiences might respond is the next. Employees may question values. Regulators may focus on compliance. Investors may worry about financial impact. Customers may be concerned about reliability.

AI helps make this analysis possible through FleishmanHillard’s SAGE Synthetic Audiences. These simulations, built on polling data, demographics, and behavioral insights, let teams pressure-test messaging in real time.

AI can also model how a story might spread. Coverage could draw regulatory attention, spark activism, or open the door for competitors. With this foresight, teams can weigh options early, decide how to respond, and plan outreach in the right order.

AI for Story Forecasting

Reporters rarely work in isolation. Their previous stories, tone, and interview style often foreshadow how a new piece might unfold. AI can analyze this public data to forecast likely narratives, giving teams time to scenario-plan and prepare fact-based responses.

In one recent case, the FleishmanHillard team leveraged AI to generate a full-length draft of a potential investigative article based on a reporter’s in-depth inquiry, their past work, and facts they were likely to uncover. The projection closely matched the final story, serving as a clear model for the client and FH counselors to work against and affording weeks to prepare. Together, they aligned messaging, cleared responses and rehearsed scenarios. When the article ran, the team responded with focus and confidence, avoiding both unwanted attention and business disruption.

Click Above for More From the FleishmanHillard Crisis Team

AI for Crisis Content Management

Crisis response is rarely just one statement. It quickly becomes a growing stack of analytics and materials: standby statements, employee letters, investor scripts, customer updates, government briefings, media talking points, FAQs and social posts. Managing it all can become chaotic, especially with lengthy approval chains.

AI tools like FH Crisis Navigator help bring order. Acting as a virtual program manager, it adapts approved language for different audiences with speed and consistency. Using this tool, a crisis counselor can generate drafts, maintain version control, and keep updates aligned across every document. This reduces drift, speeds up approvals, embeds expert counsel, and keeps teams focused. So, when leadership needs to respond – whether to investors, regulators, customers, or the public – everything is already in place and ready for review.

AI for Scenario-Based Training

Preparation has always been essential to crisis readiness. But traditional tabletop exercises often fall short of real-world complexity. AI-powered platforms like the FleishmanHillard Crisis Simulation Lab raise the bar. Run by experienced facilitators, these simulations evolve in real time based on participant decisions. They introduce realistic challenges like media calls, stakeholder emails and viral posts, all tailored to the organization’s sector and geography.

Simulations can launch in hours instead of weeks, making them useful for both training and real-time strategy support. Structured feedback focuses on fact management, stakeholder engagement, and adaptability – building the muscle memory teams need when reputations are on the line.

AI for Campaign Risk Screening

Crises don’t always come from the outside. Sometimes a product launch, influencer partnership, or purpose-driven campaign can spark backlash, trigger scrutiny, or misfire in a volatile moment.

FH Risk Radar helps teams assess these risks before campaigns go live. It reviews concepts against regulatory guidance, cultural signals, public sentiment, and platform-specific challenges. The system scores ideas across dimensions like reputational exposure, influencer fit, message durability, and cultural sensitivity. Instead of a simple go-or-no-go call, teams get a full risk profile and clear mitigation strategies. This shifts review from a late-stage checkpoint to a strategic advantage.

From Promise to Practice

For communicators, risk leaders, and executives, AI is no longer a future promise. It’s a working tool, a strategic coach, and a force multiplier available to improve outcomes now. It surfaces early warning signs, simulates reactions, forecasts narratives, manages complex content, powers training, and screens campaigns. It delivers sharper, faster options for decision makers when every move counts.

AI’s role in crisis and risk management will only grow more sophisticated. But the message today is simple: the technology is here and can be applied to create immediate value. The leaders who use it will be better prepared to protect reputation in high-stakes moments.

At FleishmanHillard, we’re applying these tools every day to help clients anticipate challenges, navigate uncertainty, and emerge stronger. At the heart of it is Augmented Judgment, Accelerated Execution – the combination of trusted human counsel and the structured speed of AI. Together, they help organizations make better decisions, faster.

Crisis Team width=

Matt Rose (top) – Americas Lead for Crisis, Issues & Risk Management: Matt is an SVP & Senior Partner in New York with more than 30 years’ experience in advising organizations on crisis and issues management, risk mitigation, and reputation recovery. He has guided companies through reputational crises, labor issues, regulatory challenges, ESG controversies, and high-profile litigation.
Alex Lyall – Lead, Risk Management, AI & Innovation: Alex is an SVP & Partner in New York with more than 15 years of experience in crisis communications, issues management, preparedness, and risk management, working across industries. As part of the leadership team, Alex will help define best practices, shape go-to-market strategies, and scales solutions, with a focus on AI integration and talent development.
 

FH Guidelines for AI in Crisis, Issues, and Risk Management Applications

At FleishmanHillard, we apply artificial intelligence with purpose, not hype. In crisis, issues, and risk management, that means combining human expertise and experience with proven frameworks, proprietary technology, necessary confidentiality, and responsible guardrails to help organizations respond with speed, confidence, and control.
During a crisis, there is no substitute for seasoned judgment. AI can surface information, suggest language, or model scenarios, but it cannot navigate the nuance of legal implications, stakeholder dynamics, or reputational risk in real time. That takes seasoned counselors who have sat in the room, weighed the tradeoffs, and led under pressure. When the stakes are high, experience is not just helpful, it is essential.
That is why each FleishmanHillard application of AI in the Crisis, Issues and Risk Management Practice is anchored in three principles:
  • Experienced crisis counselors remain at the center of each use case, ensuring that technology enhances but never replaces human judgment.
  • Our systems are designed in secure, quality-assured environments that safeguard client information and uphold rigorous ethical standards.
  • AI is embedded within tested frameworks and workflows, allowing teams to move faster without sacrificing accuracy, accountability, or trust.
This disciplined approach ensures AI strengthens decision-making rather than creating new risks. With FleishmanHillard, organizations embrace innovation in crisis, issues, and risk management with confidence, knowing that innovation never comes at the expense of accuracy, ethics, or trust.

 

 
Article

Full Speed Ahead: An Executive’s Guide to Change Management for Regulated Reporting 

October 7, 2025
By Bob Axelrod

As the deadline for complying with the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) approaches, company leaders will soon need to evolve their reporting process. The CSRD and its underlying disclosure standards, the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), usher in a new era of reporting, requiring companies operating in the EU to provide detailed, standardized responsible business and sustainability disclosures that are audit-grade.  

The temptation to pause and await further clarifications — such as outcomes from the “Omnibus Simplification Package” — may seem prudent, but that’s a risky calculation. The direction of travel is clear, and operational readiness is a multiyear endeavor that cannot wait. 

Change Management: The Deciding Factor 

CSRD compliance is far more than a reporting exercise. It requires a transformation in how your company operates, collaborates and delivers information — with audit-ready precision and cross-functional accountability.  

If your company has experience with voluntary responsible business reporting, you’re somewhat ahead of the curve. But regulated, externally assured reporting is a different game altogether, comparable to the shifts required when financial reporting became regulated. The scale of change necessitates active executive sponsorship, clear ownership and a culture that embraces transparency and due diligence. 

Acting Now Is Essential 

Waiting for absolute certainty from regulatory bodies creates a dangerous illusion. The core requirements of the CSRD are already defined.  

Delaying action can leave your organization scrambling to catch up, leading to higher implementation costs, operational disruptions and potentially subpar reporting that may expose your organization to fines and reputational risks. Early movers can pilot new processes, identify data gaps and course-correct before mandatory disclosures are enforced, therefore gaining an advantage in data quality, audit readiness and stakeholder credibility. 

Key Steps for Success 

1. Expand Cross-Functional Collaboration: Sustainability, finance, legal, risk, HR, IT, audit, procurement and other key functions must all be fluent in responsible business principles and actively engaged in reporting processes. 

2. Upskill and Train: Teams require targeted training in data governance, due diligence and audit-level documentation — going beyond simple awareness. 

3. Resource for Rigor: Subject matter experts need greater support, including additional staff, time and specialized expertise. Empowering them is critical for accurate, timely and complete disclosures. 

4. Embed Accountability: Define clear roles, set ownership and align performance incentives. Make CSRD compliance a shared objective, visibly sponsored by both the C-suite and the board of directors. 

5. Invest in Technology: Manual data collection is no longer viable. Integrated systems for data management and workflow are non-negotiable to meet the demands of CSRD. 

Executive Leadership: Setting the Pace 

Leaders must model the mindset shift that CSRD requires. Treat compliance as a transformation, not a checkbox exercise. Champion resource allocation and insist on regular progress updates.  

Building a Resilient, Future-Ready Organization 

CSRD compliance is ultimately a change management effort — one that will be won or lost at the executive level. By setting new expectations, providing the necessary resources and embedding accountability, you can transform compliance from a regulatory burden into a strategic advantage.  

The upcoming Omnibus Simplification Package may clarify technical nuances, but the urgency to act is now. Operational readiness takes time, and the cost of playing catch-up is high. Is your organization equipped to meet not just the letter of mandatory reporting, but to thrive in this new era of transparency and due diligence? 

FleishmanHillard is here to help your organization navigate this evolving landscape. Connect with us today to propel you forward, no matter where you are on the winding road to CSRD readiness.  

Bob Axelrod width= Bob Axelrod is a member of FleishmanHillard’s global Responsible Business and Impact leadership team. He has 30+ years’ experience advising corporations on Responsible Business strategy and reporting and is spearheading a multi-agency effort to help clients effectively comply with mandatory reporting requirements, including the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive

 
Article

Tariffs, Trust and Transparency: How to Communicate Price Increases Without Losing Stakeholder Confidence

August 13, 2025
By Donna Fontana, Matt Rose and Kristie Sigler

As of August 2025, expanded US tariffs are reshaping pricing across industries, from seafood and electronics to Swiss watches and appliances. While many companies have avoided public discussion of tariff-driven price increases, this “run silent” strategy may be unsustainable as cumulative price pressures intensify and customer sensitivity peaks.

For business leaders and their communications teams, the question is no longer whether to communicate price increases but how to do so without damaging trust, inviting backlash or creating political risk.

Why Silence May Not Be Sustainable

Most organizations still approach price communication as if customers, whether in B2B or consumer markets, evaluate each increase in isolation. The reality is shifting. With tariffs now affecting multiple categories at once, customers will face higher costs from many directions simultaneously. Even modest, justified increases risk being seen as price gouging when viewed through the lens of cumulative burden.

For consumer brands, the risks are visible and often viral. For B2B companies, the stakes are just as high. Cost pressures are identical but brand recognition is often weaker and communication channels fewer.

There is also a political dimension. In sensitive categories, tariff-related price communications must consider alignment, or perceived misalignment, with the Administration’s economic narrative. Messaging that appears to contradict official positions on trade, inflation or consumer costs can draw not just customer pushback but also political scrutiny.

The Emotional Reality

Price increases may be driven by economics, but they are received emotionally. Customers, whether households or procurement teams, feel the squeeze of multiple increases across different products and services. That can produce frustration far out of proportion to any one company’s actions.

This is where communication becomes as much about empathy as explanation. Overcommunication carries its own risks but failing to address perceptions leaves a vacuum that competitors, critics or policymakers may fill. Monitoring sentiment, anticipating questions and responding in plain language should be treated as operational priorities.

Strategic Principles for Tariff-Era Price Communication

Not every company will face the same pricing challenges but many will need to refresh their approach. The following principles offer a framework for explaining price increases in a way that preserves relationships and reduces reputational risk.

1. Lead with Transparency, Not Excuses
Replace generic “rising costs” statements with specific context:

“Recent changes in trade policy have significantly increased our sourcing costs. Rather than compromise quality, we have made a modest price adjustment while continuing to invest in the partnerships and processes that protect the quality customers expect.”

2. Make It Personal, Not Political
Customers want empathy, not a policy seminar:

“We know prices are rising everywhere, and we are not immune. We are committed to fairness, transparency, and quality – even as global input costs change.”

3. Show Your Mitigation Efforts
Make it clear that you have considered the interests of all stakeholders, including policymakers, and that raising prices was the last resort:

“We have streamlined logistics and reduced packaging waste to shield customers from rising costs. We are also absorbing a portion of the increase ourselves to minimize the impact. But with input costs climbing sharply, a modest adjustment has become unavoidable.”

4. Ensure Cross-Channel Consistency
Your investor communications will be seen by customers and customer communications will be seen by policymakers. Develop unified messaging for all stakeholder groups, equip teams with consistent language and monitor every touchpoint.

5. Reinforce Brand Values
Tie the increase to commitments to quality, sustainability or integrity. A beauty brand citing tariffs also emphasized its continued investment in cruelty-free, high-quality products. The subtext: we are not cutting corners.

6. Prepare for Emotional Responses Across Markets
Monitor sentiment in real time, assess perception gaps between audiences and benchmark against peers. Be mindful of global market reactions and ensure you have the channels in place for agile, coordinated communication across regions. Respond quickly with empathy, clarity and cultural awareness when resistance rises in any market.

7. Consider Industry Coordination
Trade associations can sometimes lower political and consumer risk by explaining category-wide economics, though each brand must still deliver its own aligned message.

The Bottom Line: From Pass-Through to Reputational Risk

Pass-through pricing has evolved from a supply chain term to a source of reputational risk. While there is no universal blueprint, companies that plan now will have more control over the narrative later.

Tariffs may be beyond corporate control. But the story you tell about your pricing decisions, and the value your products deliver, is entirely yours to shape. Trust is not lost in a single price increase; it is lost when companies fail to explain why. In an environment where nearly everything costs more, transparent reasoning may be the most valuable thing you share for free.

Our Executive Advisory. Your C-level advantage.

Article

What America’s AI Action Plan Means for Leaders Now

July 24, 2025
By Josh McConnell

Don’t think of this as just a policy reset. It’s a reputational crossroads. In a deregulatory moment, the real challenge isn’t compliance. It’s communication plain and simple: how to explain, defend and lead through what comes next.

The U.S. government has issued its clearest signal yet that it intends to lead the world in AI through acceleration over regulation.

America’s AI Action Plan, unveiled this month, reframes U.S. tech policy around three pillars: innovation, infrastructure, and international competitiveness. It rolls back many of the Biden-era safety and fairness frameworks, instead emphasizing open-source development, rapid deployment and private-sector partnership. For CCOs and CMOs, this isn’t just a policy update. It’s a pressure shift. With fewer federal rules in place, the burden of defining and defending responsible AI now falls squarely on companies themselves. That means your narrative, transparency and readiness matter more than ever.

How To Respond Ahead of the Spotlight

1. From frameworks to frontline comms, you can feel scrutiny shifting
With Biden-era guardrails rolled back, there’s more ambiguity and reputational risk. Review your systems, filtering practices and content neutrality positions ASAP. Comms teams need clarity and defensibility, especially where DEI, safety filters and model transparency intersect.

2. Prepare your public narrative before the news cycle tests it
Build messaging that goes beyond launches and investor decks. Emphasize ethical foresight, safety, training transparency and societal value in your comms. Assume watchdog groups, press and policymakers are already watching and look at your narrative through their eyes and position accordingly. Even consider a virtual audience simulation that will pressure test messaging for different mindsets. It’s ultimate defense as offense.

3. Make your company part of the national story
This plan isn’t just tech policy. It’s economic and diplomatic strategy. Companies that align their messaging with national priorities like innovation, infrastructure and workforce development will carry more weight with policymakers, partners and procurement leaders.

And in today’s generative search environment, those narratives aren’t just for press releases. They’re a crucial part of brand discovery. Organizations are can shape how they are surfaced, summarized and evaluated in search. If your brand isn’t telling a clear story, it’s likely that AI will try to do it for you or ignore you completely.

4. Engage now, not later
If your teams haven’t opened dialogue with NIST, OSTP or other agency stakeholders, now is the time to start. Participation in federal consultations and comment periods will shape procurement standards and signal leadership. You don’t want silence to be interpreted as an absence of a point of view.

5. Signal leadership through your talent
AI-readiness isn’t just about model performance. This is all about workforce planning. Use this moment to communicate investments in retraining, apprenticeships and education. This is reputational insulation and long-term eligibility for federal partnerships.

6. Strengthen your risk and compliance narrative
This plan includes stricter export controls, national security filters and new expectations for “secure by design” standards. Global comms must now reflect both regulatory divergence (EU, China) and internal alignment across legal, engineering and policy.

7. Know where your infra story fits
For companies in data centers, chips or energy, this is also an opportunity moment. Comms teams should coordinate early with government affairs, bid teams and legal to ensure eligibility positioning aligns with public messaging.

8. Plan for federal-state friction
As state-level bias audits, content governance and privacy laws expand, tensions with federal policy will grow. Your public narrative and internal compliance playbook must account for that dual reality.

So what comes next?

The companies that lead through this moment won’t be those that publish the longest policies. They’ll be the ones who explain their role with the most clarity, credibility and consistency both internally and externally.

The policy shift is clear: the U.S. is betting on speed, scale and innovation. But for communications leaders, the implications run deeper.

The questions coming next about explainability, bias, security and global alignment won’t be answered by engineers alone. They’ll require strong narratives, clear values and messages that hold up under scrutiny. Communications team won’t follow this story. They’ll help define it.

Josh McConnell  Josh McConnell is a VP of Technology based in New York where he helps companies navigate complex narratives at the intersection of innovation, reputation and culture. He brings over 15 years of experience across journalism and corporate comms, with leadership roles at Uber and Xero. As a journalist, he regularly interviewed tech leaders including Tim Cook, Satya Nadella and Jack Dorsey.

 
Article

Protecting Relationships During a Cyber Crisis

June 3, 2025
By Cody Want

When a cyber incident hits, IT and legal are often the first to get the call—for good reason. IT teams must act swiftly to contain, remediate and investigate the breach, while legal teams must ensure compliance with regulatory and contractual obligations and manage legal exposure.

But a strictly technical or legal lens can narrow your field of vision. Without broader perspective, you risk overlooking the long-term impact on trust and reputation. In the critical early hours of a response, you need someone in the room to ask: “Now that we know what we’re required to do—what else should we do?”

How you manage the technical and procedural aspects of a cyber incident is essential—it’s foundational to restoring operational confidence. But reputation isn’t built on competence alone; it’s a true test of values. In a crisis, stakeholders are paying attention not only to what you do, but how you engage—and whether your actions reflect the commitments you’ve made in steadier times. The impressions formed in these moments of uncertainty can endure far beyond the incident itself.

Think of cyber incident response as a three-legged stool: IT, legal and communications. Without that third leg, your response may be technically compliant—but misaligned and disconnected from the broader reality of stakeholder expectations. That imbalance can compound risk.

Communicating through a cyber crisis is rarely straightforward. There’s significant pressure to provide clarity on the situation, but forensic investigations take time, threat actors cover their tracks and facts change. The difficulty of navigating these considerations—and the potential impact of a misstep—doesn’t mean you should downplay the need to communicate. It means it’s more important than ever to fill that space, especially when the demand for communications is highest.

That complexity isn’t a reason to step back from communication—it’s a signal to step in more thoughtfully. In moments of high uncertainty, demand for transparency rises.

The right communications strategy acknowledges these challenges while ensuring that trust and relationships aren’t casualties of the crisis. Here are three principles to guide your approach:

  • Be stakeholder-centric: Start with a clear understanding of who your stakeholders are and what they need to hear from you. Reputation is shaped in the details of how you communicate—how you time employee updates, brief partners and how you equip and support customer-facing teams.
  • Avoid media tunnel vision: The headlines matter, but they’re not the whole story. In most incidents, your long-term reputation is shaped more by internal and stakeholder communications than by a single news cycle. Media relations is just one part—often a small part—of a much broader response.
  • Think of future conversations: Imagine explaining your decisions months from now to a key stakeholder. They might not be fully satisfied, but will they understand and respect how you handled the situation given the constraints you were facing?

When and How to Communicate

Cyber incidents create uncertainty. If you don’t provide information to your stakeholders, others will do it for you—customers on social media, employees in break rooms, journalists on deadline.

More On Planning For Uncertainty: Meet the Global Executive Advisory

This doesn’t mean sharing everything, with everyone, all at once. It means thoughtfully assessing what your stakeholders likely know or assume, what you know and can responsibly say, and how best to bridge the gap. There’s no perfect answer. Often, it’s a day-by-day judgment call.

Understanding every stakeholder’s perspective and expectations in this level of detail takes work—but it’s work that always pays off. In a crisis, you’ll never regret having spent time preparing your communications strategy.

Some of the key questions to ask:

  • Clients & Partners: Should high-value relationships get a direct update or a 1:1 call? How are you supporting them through operational disruption?
  • Customers: Are they worried about incompetence—or their data? How are you addressing concerns, inquiries, and frustration?
  • Employees: Do they know what they can and can’t say? Are they prepared to respond to external questions or internal uncertainty?
  • Media & Digital: Should you respond to inquiries, or would that validate speculation? How do you monitor and address unverified rumors before they escalate? What should you do about blogs and anonymous accounts?
  • Board & Investors: How do you keep key stakeholders informed without escalating concern or overpromising outcomes?
  • Regulators & Authorities: Beyond mandated disclosures, what messaging aligns with your broader corporate values?
  • Other Key Audiences: Who else expects to hear from you? Have you considered suppliers, industry associations, or even competitors who might be affected?

More Than a Response—A Reputation Strategy

IT and legal are essential to resolving the technical and regulatory dimensions of a cyber incident. But stakeholders don’t measure your performance by minimum requirements—they measure it by how you made them feel. Ask yourself: are you communicating in a way that reassures and retains trust?

The best responses manage short-term pressures without compromising long-term relationships. Even within the constraints of investigation and legal risk, organizations that integrate communications expertise are better positioned to emerge with credibility intact—and often stronger.

Cyber incidents may be inevitable. Reputational damage doesn’t have to be. The real question isn’t just whether you responded— it’s whether you’re responding in a way that strengthens trust and credibility in the long run.

Cody Want Cody Want is FleishmanHillard’s U.S. Cyber Crisis Lead with extensive experience in cyber incident response and preparedness. He has helped clients through a wide range of crisis and issues situations, including undercover media investigations, major restructures, union disputes and many other regulatory and reputational challenges.

 
Article

FleishmanHillard Launches Global Executive Advisory to Help Brands Navigate an Uncertain Marketplace

May 29, 2025

FleishmanHillard today announced the launch of its Global Executive Advisory, a strategic network of senior counselors designed to help C-suite leaders navigate special situations, high-impact issues and transformative change. The group is now operational and actively engaging with clients managing risk and opportunity in the face of global volatility, geopolitical uncertainty and increasing stakeholder scrutiny.

With more than 50 senior advisors across the United States, EMEA and APAC, the Global Executive Advisory pairs relevant specialists with global client leaders and sector experts to deliver precise, high-velocity counsel. The group provides integrated advisory across financial communications, crisis and issues, ESG and responsible business, talent and transformation, public affairs and brand impact. The Advisory group also taps into omniearnedID’s proprietary analytics platform — including genAI-enabled solutions that accelerate insight, risk evaluation, narrative development and decision-making.

“FleishmanHillard thrives by anticipating what our clients will need next — and by showing up with the right people to help them lead through it,” said J.J. Carter, president and chief executive officer. “The Global Executive Advisory is an extension of that legacy. It brings together first-rate advisors and modern solutions from across our network to meet the demands of this moment — leaders who understand not just communication but the weight of decision-making in a time of profound uncertainty and unpredictability. This is about accelerating impact, elevating counsel and unlocking the full value of our collective expertise.”

Rachel Catanach, head of the Global Executive Advisory, shared that while these are deeply uncertain times FleishmanHillard’s stake in the ground is clear: strategic communication is a key driver for companies wanting decision advantage despite the dilemmas they face.

“Whether it be navigating geopolitics, supply chain arbitrage, identifying new cross-industry partners, communicating new pricing or embedding AI into all operations, the winners and losers in times of uncertainty are often defined by the quality of their communication. In navigating uncertainty, the most grounded leaders focus on what aspects of their operations are immutable: the constants—people, purpose, values—that act as anchors – and then look to innovate and find a third way for those areas requiring a pivot. From an organizational perspective, that means focusing on your people and providing as much assurance as possible even if you can’t provide all the answers,” Catanach said. “That requires honesty, vulnerability and discipline. Share what decisions are being made, what’s on hold and why. Under-promise and over-deliver. That builds trust.”

Read More From Rachel: Turning Uncertainty into Opportunity

“A brand is more than a message — it’s an experience,” added Jim Joseph, global head of Brand Impact. “And in uncertain times, it’s often the brand experience that either connects people or loses them. That’s why executive counsel like this drives business results. We’re helping leaders reinforce what’s true in the world today and relevant in the moment so they can navigate complexity, lead with confidence and keep their brand experience connected to what matters most.” 

Built for flexibility and scale, the Global Executive Advisory enables FleishmanHillard to rapidly assess client needs and activate the right mix of internal and external experts. In addition to its in-house capabilities, the firm will draw on select partners across the Omnicom network including Daggerwing Group, Maslansky + Partners and public affairs firms PLUS, DDC, VOX Global and Mercury where specific expertise is required.

The cohort of advisors is equipped with proprietary tools and frameworks to solve complex challenges, and can also access resources across the full FleishmanHillard, OPRG and Omnicom network quickly. Some of these tools and frameworks include Connectivity Diagnostic, which allows clients to assess how aligned their organization is with the many outside forces that are shaping their story; Risk Radar, which is a forward-looking telemetry system that will help organizations spot reputational issues before they break; and the Two Truths framework, which is designed to help clients navigate competing belief systems to build trust in a highly polarized environment.

The Global Executive Advisory reflects FleishmanHillard’s commitment to delivering the highest level of counsel with the pace and precision today’s leaders demand. It will accelerate how the firm delivers value to clients — by putting the right talent, experience and thinking in place to guide them through their most consequential moments.

This launch also represents a broader evolution of FleishmanHillard’s Corporate Affairs model, which connects capabilities across five advisory pillars: Financial Communications; Crisis, Issues and Risk; Talent and Transformation; Responsible Business; and Public Affairs. The approach deepens the firm’s relevance to the C-suite and strengthens its positioning in special situations.

“Yes, caution is warranted. But the future won’t wait for certainty. It belongs to those who lead through the uncertainty, navigating with strategy, innovation, courage and integrity,” shared Catanach. “Let others chase the trend. We build relevance that lasts.”

FleishmanHillard Executive Advisory Board

Article

Communicating Through Dilemmas: Turning Uncertainty into Opportunity

By Rachel Catanach

I recently finished reading a book by Australian author Richard Flanagan called Question 7. The book explores his family and sense of place, set against the geopolitics of World War II. One detail that gave me pause was the title. Question 7 refers to a metaphysical puzzle posed in a short story by Russian writer Anton Chekhov:

“Wednesday, June 17, 1881, a train had to leave Station A at 3 a.m. in order to reach Station B at 11 p.m.; just as the train was about to depart, however, an order came that the train had to reach Station B by 7 p.m. Who loves longer, a man or a woman?”

Chekhov’s point is that the writer’s job is to ask the deepest questions without purporting to answer them.

Why is this relevant to communicators? Question 7 made me think about the kinds of dilemmas CEOs and C-suite leaders face every day in today’s uncertain, unpredictable environment. In a world where we have data, data everywhere, the C-suite has never faced such hard dilemmas that call on all their leadership powers and demand judgment beyond logic. They require clarity, conviction and communication.

They are operating in a world where the the new reality is … uncertainty.  They can no longer trust the models they’ve always relied on. Stakeholder views are in constant motion and increasingly polarized. Customer demands are elevated, consumer perceptions have become unpredictable and technology is driving consumption at a dizzying speed. Multiple truths are operating simultaneously, creating complexity, confusion and a need to navigate and scenario-plan in new ways at each turning point.

The escalating daily dilemmas and heightened risk will paralyze some CEOs but bring competitive opportunities for others—when tackled with decision advantage as opposed to decision regret.

That challenge is playing out at a global scale. According to the World Economic Forum’s May 2025 Chief Economists Outlook, 82% of chief economists say global uncertainty is currently “very high,” with trade, monetary and fiscal policy cited as the most volatile factors. Meanwhile, 79% expect recent U.S. policy shifts to create long-term global disruption, and nearly half of all organizations are planning to delay decisions or diversify operations in response.

For communicators, this only raises the stakes. In this kind of environment, decisiveness without alignment becomes a liability. It’s not just what leaders decide—it’s how they communicate it, who they bring with them and how ready they are to pivot when conditions shift again.

That’s why communication isn’t downstream support. In this high-risk environment, it’s often the strategic driver of success or failure. Of winning—or, at the very least, not losing. In this uncertain environment, there will be both. Yes, strategy is important.  But communication that is truly tailored to stakeholders, without compromising values, but accounting for trade-offs, is the name of the game.

Whether the challenge is market-facing or deeply internal and out of public view, communication is often the foundation of no-regret decisions that maximize opportunity as well as minimize risk.

This is where an integration of corporate affairs and brand impact matters most. At its best, communication unifies narrative, reputation and growth strategy—linking what an organization believes to how it behaves.

That’s the inflection point where communication becomes irreplaceable—not just as messaging, but as muscle. The strongest leaders today aren’t aiming for omniscience. They’re imagining new scenarios. They’re staying open to multiple truths, acting with purpose and adjusting with speed. And they’re asking their communication teams to be part of that front line, not the follow-up. 

As audiences approach brands from countless side doors—media, employee channels, investors, influencers and policy arenas—alignment can’t be an afterthought. Communication must connect narrative to value, decipher signals from the noise and turn leadership intent into audience impact. It marks a shift from defensive, reactive cycles to deliberate, plotted momentum.

Creating Anchors in an Uncertain Environment: Hear More From Rachel on the It’s No Fluke Podcast

This is how resilience is built. Not just in risk management, but in the discipline to return to your anchors—people, purpose, values—and communicate them clearly, especially when answers are incomplete. The most credible leaders today are the ones who say, “Here’s what we know. Here’s what we’re watching. Here’s how we’ll stay ready.” The credible leaders are those who understand context and how it connects to community and culture and drives decision-making.

Because let’s be honest: no one has a crystal ball big enough for this moment. But those with a process, a plan, the predictive tools and a point of view? They’re the ones leading with confidence—even in a time of shared ambiguity.

And they’re not doing it alone. They’re surrounding themselves with trusted partners who bring clarity to complexity. Who understand both the risk landscape and the human context. Who know that in a fragmented, high-pressure environment, communication isn’t just the playbook—it’s the platform.

Cody Want Rachel Catanach leads FleishmanHillard’s New York and Boston offices and the Global Executive Advisory, counseling CEOs on leadership transitions, board engagement and high-stakes issues. A global PR industry advocate, she has spoken at Davos, moderated at Cannes Lions and co-authored The Page Society’s Beyond Communication report. She was also a 2024 PRWeek Woman of Distinction.

 
Article

Ready for What’s Next: Corporate Preparedness & Resilience in the Age of Permacrisis

May 23, 2025
By Vipan Gill

Crises are no longer episodic disruptions. Today, they form a continuous backdrop – an evolving dynamic that threatens organizational resilience and corporate reputation. Organizations that embed crisis preparedness as a core strategic capability – not simply an insurance policy – will be positioned not just to weather future challenges, but to lead through them.

That’s because risk today is faster, more complex and amplified across more dimensions than ever before. We are operating in a state of “permacrisis”. While crises are not necessarily new, it’s the speed, complexity, and amplification of risks across many different channels that have changed. Every organization faces compounding risks, whether they make headlines or not. Yet many companies remain underprepared. Insights from this month’s PRWeek Crisis Comms Conference 2025 revealed that nearly half of all companies still lack a formal crisis plan.

Readiness is Cultural, Not Just Tactical

In a world where every day feels like a crisis, many leaders mistake constant exposure for readiness. But resilience isn’t built in the moment. It’s embedded over time. Today’s risks demand deeper planning and perspective. Organizations must embed clarity of ownership, decision-making agility, and cross-functional coordination well before a disruption occurs.

At FleishmanHillard, this belief is core to how we guide clients. The conference reinforced what we see in our daily counsel; the absence of a crisis playbook isn’t the only risk. The bigger vulnerability is failing to operationalize crisis readiness as a living, evolving part of the business. In an era defined by disruption, resilience is the ultimate differentiator.

From Reactive to Resilient: Redefining Crisis Leadership

Historically, crisis management was shaped by high-profile, acute events. Today’s most damaging issues often simmer below the surface, emerging gradually, escalating quickly, and leaving little time for response.

World-class crisis outcomes now hinge on proactive, sustained investments in organizational preparedness, not just reactive action during a major event. Resilient brands do not just defend their reputation during crises; they proactively strengthen it through everyday actions.

To move from reactive to resilient, organizations need a modern readiness framework that embeds resilience into day-to-day operations. Core elements include:

  • Real-Time Risk Sensing: Implement tools to monitor traditional media, social platforms, fringe forums, and the dark web for emerging threats.
  • Reputation-First Scenario Planning: Develop scenarios that address both operational and reputational impacts, with predefined decision-making criteria.
  • Authentic Language Frameworks: Ensure communications reflect organizational values, particularly on sensitive or contentious topics to maintain credibility.
  • Strategic Spokesperson Planning: Prepare visible leaders who can act as credible, empathetic representatives under pressure.
  • Continuous Crisis Training: Treat readiness as a muscle to be exercised regularly, not a skill activated during emergencies alone.

In today’s attention economy, fringe narratives can move mainstream within hours. Resilient organizations sense what’s coming and shape the narrative before others do.

Proactive Narrative Management: Preparing for AI-driven Risk

AI is changing how reputations are shaped. Machine learning models, news algorithms, and social amplification systems serve as frontline interpreters of a brand’s behavior and its reputation. These systems don’t wait for formal updates, they ingest, index and amplify whatever narratives are most readily available.

That’s why prebunking– establishing credible narratives proactively–is essential. Organizations can no longer rely solely on reactive corrections during an active crisis. Instead, building trusted reputational foundations early on improves how audiences, and AI systems, interpret emerging narratives.

A strong crisis preparedness program ensures that communications strategies are not merely reactive after an incident, but active, strategic, and values-led well in advance.

Elevating the Role of Communications in Crisis Strategy

The role of communicators has evolved.  In a permacrisis environment, we are not just message managers, we are strategic stewards of corporate reputation—proactively guiding organizations through uncertainty, informed by data, technology, and human judgment.

While technology provides powerful tools, the true advantage lies in how organizations interpret those signals and act on them. Human insights remain essential. Context. Empathy. Judgement. These are the ingredients of trusted, decisive leadership in the moments that matter.

Our Approach  

Our global crisis and issues management team combines real-world, local market experience with global reach—guiding clients through uncertainty across time zones, sectors and cultures. We help organizations build and operationalize readiness, so that when it matters most, you’re not reacting—you’re leading.

FleishmanHillard Executive Advisory Board